2008Zhonghua fangshexian yixue zazhiRequires access

MR perfusion imaging study of the hepatic hemodynamics in pigs

Shenping Yu, Yanling Zhang, Li Jiang, Bi-tao Pan, Li He, Jianyong Yang, Meng Quanfei

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the MR perfusion imaging in measuring the hemodynamics of liver.Methods CT and MR perfusion imaging were performed in livers of 13 pigs.The hepatic artery perfusion(HAP),portal vein perfusion(PVP),total hepatic blood flow(THBF),portal vein perfusion index(PVI),distribution volume(DV)and mean transit time(MTT)were calculated and compared respectively.Hemodynamics of the liver from two kinds of imaging was compared by paked t-test,and the relativity was analyzed by Pearson correlation analysis.Results In CT and MR perfusion imaging of the 13 pigs:the hepatic artery perfusion(HAP)were(37.7±7.38)and(35.80±7.31)ml-min-1·100ml-1.the portal vein perfusion(PVP)were(123.16 35.89)and(121.40±36.81)ml·min-1·100 ml-1.the total hepatic blood flow(THBF)were(160.88±37.05)and(157.21±38.71)ml·min-1·100 ml-1.the portal vein perfusion index(PVI)were(75.95±5.21)%and(76.63±5.24)%,the distilbution volume(DV)were(35.10±11.17)%and(41.03±10.06)%。The mean transit time(MTT)were(14.08±1.40)and(14.94±1.32)s.There were no statistical differences for HAP,PVP,THBF and PVI between CT and MR perfusion imaging(t=1.263,0.926,1.225,-1.115,P>0.05).There were no statistical differences for DV and MTT(t=-3.345,-3.200,P<0.01).Analysis of these two kinds of imaging showed the correlation coefficient of PVP,THBF and PVI were hishly related(r>0.85,P<0.01).Correlation coefficient of HAP,DV and M1T were moderately related(r>0.70,P<0.01).Conclusions MR perfusion Call quantify the blood flow parameters of liver accurately.It is close to that of the CT perfusion imaging. Key words: Magnetic resonance imaging; Tomography,X-ray computed; Liver

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the MR perfusion imaging in measuring the hemodynamics of liver.Methods CT and MR perfusion imaging were performed in livers of 13 pigs.The hepatic artery perfusion(HAP),portal vein perfusion(PVP),total hepatic blood flow(THBF),portal vein perfusion index(PVI),distribution volume(DV)and mean transit time(MTT)were calculated and compared respectively.Hemodynamics of the liver from two kinds of imaging was compared by paked t-test,and the relativity was analyzed by Pearson correlation analysis.Results In CT and MR perfusion imaging of the 13 pigs:the hepatic artery perfusion(HAP)were(37.7±7.38)and(35.80±7.31)ml-min-1·100ml-1.the portal vein perfusion(PVP)were(123.16 35.89)and(121.40±36.81)ml·min-1·100 ml-1.the total hepatic blood flow(THBF)were(160.88±37.05)and(157.21±38.71)ml·min-1·100 ml-1.the portal vein perfusion index(PVI)were(75.95±5.21)%and(76.63±5.24)%,the distilbution volume(DV)were(35.10±11.17)%and(41.03±10.06)%。The mean transit time(MTT)were(14.08±1.40)and(14.94±1.32)s.There were no statistical differences for HAP,PVP,THBF and PVI between CT and MR perfusion imaging(t=1.263,0.926,1.225,-1.115,P>0.05).There were no statistical differences for DV and MTT(t=-3.345,-3.200,P<0.01).Analysis of these two kinds of imaging showed the correlation coefficient of PVP,THBF and PVI were hishly related(r>0.85,P<0.01).Correlation coefficient of HAP,DV and M1T were moderately related(r>0.70,P<0.01).Conclusions MR perfusion Call quantify the blood flow parameters of liver accurately.It is close to that of the CT perfusion imaging. Key words: Magnetic resonance imaging; Tomography,X-ray computed; Liver

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the MR perfusion imaging in measuring the hemodynamics of liver.Methods CT and MR perfusion imaging were performed in livers of 13 pigs.The hepatic artery perfusion(HAP),portal vein perfusion(PVP),total hepatic blood flow(THBF),portal vein perfusion index(PVI),distribution volume(DV)and mean transit time(MTT)were calculated and compared respectively.Hemodynamics of the liver from two kinds of imaging was compared by paked t-test,and the relativity was analyzed by Pearson correlation analysis.Results In CT and MR perfusion imaging of the 13 pigs:the hepatic artery perfusion(HAP)were(37.7±7.38)and(35.80±7.31)ml-min-1·100ml-1.the portal vein perfusion(PVP)were(123.16 35.89)and(121.40±36.81)ml·min-1·100 ml-1.the total hepatic blood flow(THBF)were(160.88±37.05)and(157.21±38.71)ml·min-1·100 ml-1.the portal vein perfusion index(PVI)were(75.95±5.21)%and(76.63±5.24)%,the distilbution volume(DV)were(35.10±11.17)%and(41.03±10.06)%。The mean transit time(MTT)were(14.08±1.40)and(14.94±1.32)s.There were no statistical differences for HAP,PVP,THBF and PVI between CT and MR perfusion imaging(t=1.263,0.926,1.225,-1.115,P>0.05).There were no statistical differences for DV and MTT(t=-3.345,-3.200,P<0.01).Analysis of these two kinds of imaging showed the correlation coefficient of PVP,THBF and PVI were hishly related(r>0.85,P<0.01).Correlation coefficient of HAP,DV and M1T were moderately related(r>0.70,P<0.01).Conclusions MR perfusion Call quantify the blood flow parameters of liver accurately.It is close to that of the CT perfusion imaging. Key words: Magnetic resonance imaging; Tomography,X-ray computed; Liver

Key concepts: Medicine, Perfusion, Perfusion scanning, Nuclear medicine, Hemodynamics, Blood flow, Blood volume, Artery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
MR perfusion imaging study of the hepatic hemodynamics in pigs — Research Paper | ScholarLens