Comparative analysis of the clinic efficacy of transurethral plasmakinetic resection of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate for high-risk benign prostatic hyperplasia

Objective To compare and analyze the clinic efficacy of transurethral plasmakinetic resection of the prostate(PKRP) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) on high-risk benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH).Methods Twenty-four patient with high-risk BPH were treated by TURP from April 2002 to March 2009,and 26 patients were treated by PKRP from March 2009 to March 2013.The results of two groups were retrospectively analyzed.Results All the 50 cases of the two groups were operated successfully.There were significant differences in the number of cases,operating time,the incidence of TRUS occurring,blood loss in operation,case of blood transfusion between TURP group and PKRP group(P ＜0.01).Conclusions PKRP is superior to TUVP in safety for high-risk benign prostatic hyperplasia patients,PKRP is more suitable to high-risk BPH. Key words: Transurethral plasmakinetic resection of the prostate;  Transurethral resection of the prostate;  High-risk benign prostatic hyperplasia