ScholarLens Back to search
2007•Acta Academiae Medicinae Qingdao UniversitatisRequires access

TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION AND BIPOLAR PLASMAKINETIC RESECTION OF PROSTATE FOR BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA

Luo B

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of transurethral resection of prostate(TURP) and bipolar plasmakinetic resection of prostate(PKRP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH).MethodsTURP was done in 66 patients,and PKRP in 54.The outcome was compared between the two groups.ResultsThe blood loss was more in TURP than in PKRP(t=6.47,P0.01).The blood sodium concentration declined three hours after TURP compared with before operation(t=6.07,P0.01),and also lower than that of PKRP group(t=5.50,P0.01).No significant differences between the two groups were noted in terms of the operation duration,postoperative IPSS and the urinary flow rate.ConclusionBoth TURP and PKRP are effective for BPH,but PKRP is a safer and more effective method with fewer complications and less influence on physiological function.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of transurethral resection of prostate(TURP) and bipolar plasmakinetic resection of prostate(PKRP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH).MethodsTURP was done in 66 patients,and PKRP in 54.The outcome was compared between the two groups.ResultsThe blood loss was more in TURP than in PKRP(t=6.47,P0.01).The blood sodium concentration declined three hours after TURP compared with before operation(t=6.07,P0.01),and also lower than that of PKRP group(t=5.50,P0.01).No significant differences between the two groups were noted in terms of the operation duration,postoperative IPSS and the urinary flow rate.ConclusionBoth TURP and PKRP are effective for BPH,but PKRP is a safer and more effective method with fewer complications and less influence on physiological function.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of transurethral resection of prostate(TURP) and bipolar plasmakinetic resection of prostate(PKRP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH).MethodsTURP was done in 66 patients,and PKRP in 54.The outcome was compared between the two groups.ResultsThe blood loss was more in TURP than in PKRP(t=6.47,P0.01).The blood sodium concentration declined three hours after TURP compared with before operation(t=6.07,P0.01),and also lower than that of PKRP group(t=5.50,P0.01).No significant differences between the two groups were noted in terms of the operation duration,postoperative IPSS and the urinary flow rate.ConclusionBoth TURP and PKRP are effective for BPH,but PKRP is a safer and more effective method with fewer complications and less influence on physiological function.

Key concepts: Medicine, Transurethral resection of the prostate, Urology, Prostate, Resection, Hyperplasia, Prostatectomy, Blood loss

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION AND BIPOLAR PLASMAKINETIC RESECTION OF PROSTATE FOR BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA — Research Paper | ScholarLens