The difference betweenclinical efficacy of nucleoside antiviral drugs of chronic hepatitis B in Chineseliterature
DU Xia-wei, Jun Tan, Bo Zhou
Abstract
DU Xia-wei, Jun Tan, Bo Zhou
Abstract
:Objective Identify thedifference in the use of Nucleoside analogues. Methods Search nearly 3-year clinicalefficacy reports about nucleoside (acid) analogues like Lamivudine and Adefovir dipivoxil,Entecavir,and analyze the inner of the difference. Resaula In different reports, theeffects of Nucleoside analogues bring a significant difference, including the HBV-DNAnegative rate, Serum conversion rate of HBeAg, and Normalization rate of ALT. ConclusionWhen dealing with the Chronic Hepatitis B, Lamivudine and Adefovir dipivoxil, Entecavirhave great different in effect, Doctor should take the actual situation in patients withthe drug combination treatment.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
:Objective Identify thedifference in the use of Nucleoside analogues. Methods Search nearly 3-year clinicalefficacy reports about nucleoside (acid) analogues like Lamivudine and Adefovir dipivoxil,Entecavir,and analyze the inner of the difference. Resaula In different reports, theeffects of Nucleoside analogues bring a significant difference, including the HBV-DNAnegative rate, Serum conversion rate of HBeAg, and Normalization rate of ALT. ConclusionWhen dealing with the Chronic Hepatitis B, Lamivudine and Adefovir dipivoxil, Entecavirhave great different in effect, Doctor should take the actual situation in patients withthe drug combination treatment.
Key concepts: Adefovir, Entecavir, Lamivudine, Nucleoside, Chronic hepatitis, HBeAg, Nucleoside analogue, Significant difference