2019Zhonghua heyixue yu fenzi yingxiang zazhiRequires access

Radiosensitization of sodium glycididazole in esophageal cancer evaluated by 18F-FMISO PET/CT

Dengyun Chen, Huiqin Xu, Hui Wang, Dan Zhang, Wenjing Yu, Xiaoyu Su

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the feasibility of sodium glycididazole (CMNa) on the radiosensitization of esophageal cancer (EC) by 18F-fluoromisonidazole (FMISO) PET/CT. Methods A total of 60 patients with EC from December 2016 to December 2017 were enrolled prospectively and were divided into control group (n=30; 21 males, 9 females; age: (56.6±10.0) years) and experimental group (n=30; 20 males, 10 females; age: (59.3±9.0) years) using completely randomized grouping design. Patients in the control group received radiotherapy alone, and those in the experimental group were treated with conventional radiotherapy and CMNa. All patients underwent 18F-FMISO PET/CT imaging 1 week before and after radiotherapy. The imaging results were visually and semi-quantitatively analyzed. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), tumor/muscle ratio (T/M), and hypoxia volume (HV) were calculated. Paired t test, two-sample t test and χ2 test were used to analyze the data. Results T/M and HV in the control group before and after radiotherapy were 3.92±0.57 vs 1.66±0.35, (1.84±0.31) vs (1.04±0.15) mm3, respectively; T/M and HV in the experimental group before and after radiotherapy were 4.01±0.68 vs 1.27±0.11, (2.01±0.22) vs (0.90±0.09) mm3, respectively. The primary tumor T/M, HV after radiotherapy in 2 groups were significantly lower than those before radiotherapy (t values: 12.15-24.43, all P<0.05) and the amplitudes of T/M and HV in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group (ΔT/M: 2.77±0.60 vs 2.25±0.49, ΔHV: (1.12±0.18) vs (0.81±0.26) mm3;t values: 3.00 and 1.80, both P<0.05). Meanwhile, the local control rate of EC after 3 months in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group (80.0%(24/30) vs 53.3%(16/30); χ2=4.80, P<0.05). Conclusion CMNa has the radiosensitizing effect on EC and the 18F-FMISO PET/CT can evaluate the radiosensitization effect. Key words: Esophageal neoplasms; Radiotherapy; Radiation-sensitizing agents; Nitroimidazoles; Positron-emission tomography; Tomography, X-ray computed; Misonidazole

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate the feasibility of sodium glycididazole (CMNa) on the radiosensitization of esophageal cancer (EC) by 18F-fluoromisonidazole (FMISO) PET/CT. Methods A total of 60 patients with EC from December 2016 to December 2017 were enrolled prospectively and were divided into control group (n=30; 21 males, 9 females; age: (56.6±10.0) years) and experimental group (n=30; 20 males, 10 females; age: (59.3±9.0) years) using completely randomized grouping design. Patients in the control group received radiotherapy alone, and those in the experimental group were treated with conventional radiotherapy and CMNa. All patients underwent 18F-FMISO PET/CT imaging 1 week before and after radiotherapy. The imaging results were visually and semi-quantitatively analyzed. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), tumor/muscle ratio (T/M), and hypoxia volume (HV) were calculated. Paired t test, two-sample t test and χ2 test were used to analyze the data. Results T/M and HV in the control group before and after radiotherapy were 3.92±0.57 vs 1.66±0.35, (1.84±0.31) vs (1.04±0.15) mm3, respectively; T/M and HV in the experimental group before and after radiotherapy were 4.01±0.68 vs 1.27±0.11, (2.01±0.22) vs (0.90±0.09) mm3, respectively. The primary tumor T/M, HV after radiotherapy in 2 groups were significantly lower than those before radiotherapy (t values: 12.15-24.43, all P<0.05) and the amplitudes of T/M and HV in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group (ΔT/M: 2.77±0.60 vs 2.25±0.49, ΔHV: (1.12±0.18) vs (0.81±0.26) mm3;t values: 3.00 and 1.80, both P<0.05). Meanwhile, the local control rate of EC after 3 months in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group (80.0%(24/30) vs 53.3%(16/30); χ2=4.80, P<0.05). Conclusion CMNa has the radiosensitizing effect on EC and the 18F-FMISO PET/CT can evaluate the radiosensitization effect. Key words: Esophageal neoplasms; Radiotherapy; Radiation-sensitizing agents; Nitroimidazoles; Positron-emission tomography; Tomography, X-ray computed; Misonidazole

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate the feasibility of sodium glycididazole (CMNa) on the radiosensitization of esophageal cancer (EC) by 18F-fluoromisonidazole (FMISO) PET/CT. Methods A total of 60 patients with EC from December 2016 to December 2017 were enrolled prospectively and were divided into control group (n=30; 21 males, 9 females; age: (56.6±10.0) years) and experimental group (n=30; 20 males, 10 females; age: (59.3±9.0) years) using completely randomized grouping design. Patients in the control group received radiotherapy alone, and those in the experimental group were treated with conventional radiotherapy and CMNa. All patients underwent 18F-FMISO PET/CT imaging 1 week before and after radiotherapy. The imaging results were visually and semi-quantitatively analyzed. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), tumor/muscle ratio (T/M), and hypoxia volume (HV) were calculated. Paired t test, two-sample t test and χ2 test were used to analyze the data. Results T/M and HV in the control group before and after radiotherapy were 3.92±0.57 vs 1.66±0.35, (1.84±0.31) vs (1.04±0.15) mm3, respectively; T/M and HV in the experimental group before and after radiotherapy were 4.01±0.68 vs 1.27±0.11, (2.01±0.22) vs (0.90±0.09) mm3, respectively. The primary tumor T/M, HV after radiotherapy in 2 groups were significantly lower than those before radiotherapy (t values: 12.15-24.43, all P<0.05) and the amplitudes of T/M and HV in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group (ΔT/M: 2.77±0.60 vs 2.25±0.49, ΔHV: (1.12±0.18) vs (0.81±0.26) mm3;t values: 3.00 and 1.80, both P<0.05). Meanwhile, the local control rate of EC after 3 months in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group (80.0%(24/30) vs 53.3%(16/30); χ2=4.80, P<0.05). Conclusion CMNa has the radiosensitizing effect on EC and the 18F-FMISO PET/CT can evaluate the radiosensitization effect. Key words: Esophageal neoplasms; Radiotherapy; Radiation-sensitizing agents; Nitroimidazoles; Positron-emission tomography; Tomography, X-ray computed; Misonidazole

Key concepts: Medicine, Radiation therapy, Nuclear medicine, Esophageal cancer, Cancer, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Radiosensitization of sodium glycididazole in esophageal cancer evaluated by 18F-FMISO PET/CT — Research Paper | ScholarLens