2001眼外伤职业眼病杂志Requires access

Comparison between extracapsular cataract extraction and ultrasonic phacoemulsification

李冀平, 吴哲, 孟丽, 李贺敏

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

目的比较小切口非乳化囊外摘出人工晶状体植入术与超声乳化吸出人工晶状体植入术两种手术方法的临床效果.方法分别对60例小切口无缝线非超声乳化白内障囊外摘出术及60例超声乳化吸出人工晶状体植入术的术后视力,术中、术后并发症进行比较.结果小切口非乳化组术后7天裸眼视力≥1.0者8例(13.33%),0.5~0.9者39例(65%),≤0.4者13例(21.67%).超声乳化组≥1.0者5例(8.33%),0.5~0.9者50例(83.34%),≤0.4者5例(8.33%).角膜内皮浑浊:小切口组11例(18.33%),超声乳化组8例(13.33%).结论小切口非乳化白内障摘出术及超声乳化术疗效相似,差异无显著性(P>0.05),前者简便、易行、经济,适宜于基层医院开展.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

目的比较小切口非乳化囊外摘出人工晶状体植入术与超声乳化吸出人工晶状体植入术两种手术方法的临床效果.方法分别对60例小切口无缝线非超声乳化白内障囊外摘出术及60例超声乳化吸出人工晶状体植入术的术后视力,术中、术后并发症进行比较.结果小切口非乳化组术后7天裸眼视力≥1.0者8例(13.33%),0.5~0.9者39例(65%),≤0.4者13例(21.67%).超声乳化组≥1.0者5例(8.33%),0.5~0.9者50例(83.34%),≤0.4者5例(8.33%).角膜内皮浑浊:小切口组11例(18.33%),超声乳化组8例(13.33%).结论小切口非乳化白内障摘出术及超声乳化术疗效相似,差异无显著性(P>0.05),前者简便、易行、经济,适宜于基层医院开展.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

目的比较小切口非乳化囊外摘出人工晶状体植入术与超声乳化吸出人工晶状体植入术两种手术方法的临床效果.方法分别对60例小切口无缝线非超声乳化白内障囊外摘出术及60例超声乳化吸出人工晶状体植入术的术后视力,术中、术后并发症进行比较.结果小切口非乳化组术后7天裸眼视力≥1.0者8例(13.33%),0.5~0.9者39例(65%),≤0.4者13例(21.67%).超声乳化组≥1.0者5例(8.33%),0.5~0.9者50例(83.34%),≤0.4者5例(8.33%).角膜内皮浑浊:小切口组11例(18.33%),超声乳化组8例(13.33%).结论小切口非乳化白内障摘出术及超声乳化术疗效相似,差异无显著性(P>0.05),前者简便、易行、经济,适宜于基层医院开展.

Key concepts: Phacoemulsification, Cataract extraction, Medicine, Ultrasonic sensor, Ophthalmology, Optometry, Radiology, Visual acuity

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison between extracapsular cataract extraction and ultrasonic phacoemulsification — Research Paper | ScholarLens