2004Yanwaishang zhiye yanbing zazhiRequires access

Comparison between extracapsular cataract extraction and phacoemulsification

李淑珍

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

目的 比较白内障小切口囊外摘出术与超声乳化术两种方法的疗效.方法 326例(360眼)老年性白内障随机分为两组,分别采用超声乳化吸出及小切口囊外摘出术,均植入后房人工晶状体,就其术后视力、术中术后并发症进行比较.结果术后7天裸眼视力:超乳组和小切口囊外摘出组≤0.4者分别占18.34%和18.89%;0.5~0.9者占66.11%和66.67%;≥1.0者占15.55%和14.44%.术中后囊破裂玻璃体脱出:两组分别为4.44%和3.33%.术后角膜内皮水肿:分别为16.11%和17.22%.结论两种手术疗效相似,差异无显著意义(P>0.05,小切口囊外摘出术经济、简便、容易掌握,适宜于目前我国基层医院开展。

About this research paper

What this paper is about

目的 比较白内障小切口囊外摘出术与超声乳化术两种方法的疗效.方法 326例(360眼)老年性白内障随机分为两组,分别采用超声乳化吸出及小切口囊外摘出术,均植入后房人工晶状体,就其术后视力、术中术后并发症进行比较.结果术后7天裸眼视力:超乳组和小切口囊外摘出组≤0.4者分别占18.34%和18.89%;0.5~0.9者占66.11%和66.67%;≥1.0者占15.55%和14.44%.术中后囊破裂玻璃体脱出:两组分别为4.44%和3.33%.术后角膜内皮水肿:分别为16.11%和17.22%.结论两种手术疗效相似,差异无显著意义(P>0.05,小切口囊外摘出术经济、简便、容易掌握,适宜于目前我国基层医院开展。

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

目的 比较白内障小切口囊外摘出术与超声乳化术两种方法的疗效.方法 326例(360眼)老年性白内障随机分为两组,分别采用超声乳化吸出及小切口囊外摘出术,均植入后房人工晶状体,就其术后视力、术中术后并发症进行比较.结果术后7天裸眼视力:超乳组和小切口囊外摘出组≤0.4者分别占18.34%和18.89%;0.5~0.9者占66.11%和66.67%;≥1.0者占15.55%和14.44%.术中后囊破裂玻璃体脱出:两组分别为4.44%和3.33%.术后角膜内皮水肿:分别为16.11%和17.22%.结论两种手术疗效相似,差异无显著意义(P>0.05,小切口囊外摘出术经济、简便、容易掌握,适宜于目前我国基层医院开展。

Key concepts: Phacoemulsification, Medicine, Cataract extraction, Ophthalmology, Extraction (chemistry), Chromatography, Chemistry, Visual acuity

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison between extracapsular cataract extraction and phacoemulsification — Research Paper | ScholarLens