2010•Chin J Postgrad MedRequires access

Value of combined multiple tumor markers in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors

单丹

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To appraise the value of combined multiple tumor markers in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors. Methods Eighty-three patients with ovarian tumors confirmed by pathological diagnosis were tested with combined multiple tumor markers including CA125,CA19-9,alpha-fetoprotein (AFP),carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), serum ferritin (FT) preoperatively by automated chemiluminescence assay,and the relations between the results and the pathological diagnosis were analyzed retrospectively.Results There was statistical difference among the positive rates of tumor markers in malignant [ 83.87%(26/31 ) ] and benign ovarian tumors [ 36.54% (19/52) ] (P < 0.05 ). Every tumor marker had its sensitivity and specificity,but CA125 was the best marker of all. Its sensitivity was 74.2%, specificity was 55.8%,positive predictive value was 50.0% ,the specificity of CEA,AFP and FT was all 98.1%, the sensitivity of those was 16.1%, 3.2%, 16.1% respectively. When combined with the others,it could improve its specificity and positive predictive value,but the sensitivity declined greatly. Conclusion The accuracy of distinguishing the malignant from benign ovarian tumors is enhanced by combined multiple tumor markers testing. Key words: Ovarian neoplasms; Tumor markers,biological

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To appraise the value of combined multiple tumor markers in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors. Methods Eighty-three patients with ovarian tumors confirmed by pathological diagnosis were tested with combined multiple tumor markers including CA125,CA19-9,alpha-fetoprotein (AFP),carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), serum ferritin (FT) preoperatively by automated chemiluminescence assay,and the relations between the results and the pathological diagnosis were analyzed retrospectively.Results There was statistical difference among the positive rates of tumor markers in malignant [ 83.87%(26/31 ) ] and benign ovarian tumors [ 36.54% (19/52) ] (P < 0.05 ). Every tumor marker had its sensitivity and specificity,but CA125 was the best marker of all. Its sensitivity was 74.2%, specificity was 55.8%,positive predictive value was 50.0% ,the specificity of CEA,AFP and FT was all 98.1%, the sensitivity of those was 16.1%, 3.2%, 16.1% respectively. When combined with the others,it could improve its specificity and positive predictive value,but the sensitivity declined greatly. Conclusion The accuracy of distinguishing the malignant from benign ovarian tumors is enhanced by combined multiple tumor markers testing. Key words: Ovarian neoplasms; Tumor markers,biological

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To appraise the value of combined multiple tumor markers in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors. Methods Eighty-three patients with ovarian tumors confirmed by pathological diagnosis were tested with combined multiple tumor markers including CA125,CA19-9,alpha-fetoprotein (AFP),carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), serum ferritin (FT) preoperatively by automated chemiluminescence assay,and the relations between the results and the pathological diagnosis were analyzed retrospectively.Results There was statistical difference among the positive rates of tumor markers in malignant [ 83.87%(26/31 ) ] and benign ovarian tumors [ 36.54% (19/52) ] (P < 0.05 ). Every tumor marker had its sensitivity and specificity,but CA125 was the best marker of all. Its sensitivity was 74.2%, specificity was 55.8%,positive predictive value was 50.0% ,the specificity of CEA,AFP and FT was all 98.1%, the sensitivity of those was 16.1%, 3.2%, 16.1% respectively. When combined with the others,it could improve its specificity and positive predictive value,but the sensitivity declined greatly. Conclusion The accuracy of distinguishing the malignant from benign ovarian tumors is enhanced by combined multiple tumor markers testing. Key words: Ovarian neoplasms; Tumor markers,biological

Key concepts: Carcinoembryonic antigen, Tumor marker, Ovarian tumor, Pathological, Medicine, Tumor M2-PK, Pathology, Ovarian cancer

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Value of combined multiple tumor markers in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors — Research Paper | ScholarLens