2012•Unpublished venueRequires access

Reliability and validity analysis of six dimension scale of nursing performance

Guo-yun Liu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To analyze the reliability and validity of 6-D scale of nursing performance,and examine whether it is suitable in China.Methods Exploratory factor analysis,test-retest reliability,internal consistency reliability and split-half reliability were used to examine the reliability and validity of the 6-D scale.Results Exploratory factor analysis of Chinese 6-D scale and 5 common factors whose eigenvalue was bigger than 1 showed that,the accumulative contribution rate was 52.293%,the internal consistency coefficient Cronbach's αwas 0.948,half coefficient was 0.816,and ICC test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.857.Except for entry 8,13 and 30,all other entries in Chinese 6-D scale were well expressed in 6 factors and fell in its dimension.Conclusions 6-D scale is verified with a good reliability and validity for evaluating nurses'clinical competence in China. Key words: Nursing evaluation research; 6-D scale; Reliability; Validity

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To analyze the reliability and validity of 6-D scale of nursing performance,and examine whether it is suitable in China.Methods Exploratory factor analysis,test-retest reliability,internal consistency reliability and split-half reliability were used to examine the reliability and validity of the 6-D scale.Results Exploratory factor analysis of Chinese 6-D scale and 5 common factors whose eigenvalue was bigger than 1 showed that,the accumulative contribution rate was 52.293%,the internal consistency coefficient Cronbach's αwas 0.948,half coefficient was 0.816,and ICC test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.857.Except for entry 8,13 and 30,all other entries in Chinese 6-D scale were well expressed in 6 factors and fell in its dimension.Conclusions 6-D scale is verified with a good reliability and validity for evaluating nurses'clinical competence in China. Key words: Nursing evaluation research; 6-D scale; Reliability; Validity

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To analyze the reliability and validity of 6-D scale of nursing performance,and examine whether it is suitable in China.Methods Exploratory factor analysis,test-retest reliability,internal consistency reliability and split-half reliability were used to examine the reliability and validity of the 6-D scale.Results Exploratory factor analysis of Chinese 6-D scale and 5 common factors whose eigenvalue was bigger than 1 showed that,the accumulative contribution rate was 52.293%,the internal consistency coefficient Cronbach's αwas 0.948,half coefficient was 0.816,and ICC test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.857.Except for entry 8,13 and 30,all other entries in Chinese 6-D scale were well expressed in 6 factors and fell in its dimension.Conclusions 6-D scale is verified with a good reliability and validity for evaluating nurses'clinical competence in China. Key words: Nursing evaluation research; 6-D scale; Reliability; Validity

Key concepts: Cronbach's alpha, Exploratory factor analysis, Reliability (semiconductor), Scale (ratio), Internal consistency, Psychology, Validity, Statistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Reliability and validity analysis of six dimension scale of nursing performance — Research Paper | ScholarLens