丁功奎, 郑芳, 向辉, 张向阳
Abstract
目的 对比分析非超声乳化小切口白内障囊外摘出人工晶状体植入术与超声乳化吸出人工晶状体植入术的两种不同术式的效果.方法共95例(103眼)中非超声乳化小切口囊外摘出组37例(38眼),超声乳化组58例(65眼),对比观察两种术式的术后视力、散光及并发症.结果非超乳小切口白内障摘出术与超声乳化晶状体吸出术的术后视力、角膜散光及并发症差异无统计学意义.结论非超声乳化小切口白内障囊外摘出及人工晶状体植入术效果好、成本低、适合广大基层医院推广普及。
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
目的 对比分析非超声乳化小切口白内障囊外摘出人工晶状体植入术与超声乳化吸出人工晶状体植入术的两种不同术式的效果.方法共95例(103眼)中非超声乳化小切口囊外摘出组37例(38眼),超声乳化组58例(65眼),对比观察两种术式的术后视力、散光及并发症.结果非超乳小切口白内障摘出术与超声乳化晶状体吸出术的术后视力、角膜散光及并发症差异无统计学意义.结论非超声乳化小切口白内障囊外摘出及人工晶状体植入术效果好、成本低、适合广大基层医院推广普及。
Key concepts: Phacoemulsification, Ophthalmology, Intraocular lens, Cataract extraction, Medicine, Lens (geology), Extraction (chemistry), Chemistry