2012•Chin J Postgrad MedRequires access

Effect comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscope holmium laser lithotripsy in emergency patients with ureteral calculi

黄明坦, 叶泽兵, 梁国挺, 覃海森, 李晓峰

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and ureteroscope holmium laser lithotripey (URL) in emergency patients with ureteral calculi.Methods Two hundred and forty emergency patients with ureteral calculi were retrospectively analyzed,including 110 patients undergoing ESWL (ESWL group) and 130 patients undergoing URL (URL group).Results The success rate of fragmentation and calculi-free rate were 90.0% (117/130) and 80.8%(105/130) in URL group,of which were 88.2%(97/110) and 75.5%(83/110) in ESWL group with no significant difference between two groups (P > 0.05 ).The success rate of fragmentation and calculi-free rate of upper ureter in ESWL group were much better than those in URL group [93.1%(54/58) vs.84.3%(59/70),77.6% (45/58) vs.70.0% (49/70),P < 0.05 ],those of middle-lower ureter in URL group were much better than those in ESWL group [96.7%(58/60) vs.82.7%(43/52),93.3%(56/60) vs.73.1%(38/52),P<0.05].Conclusion ESWL and URL both have good curative effects in emergency patients with ureteral calculi,and ESWL has better effects for upper ureter while URL for middle-lower ureter. Key words: Ureteral calculi;  Ureteroscopes;  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the clinical effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and ureteroscope holmium laser lithotripey (URL) in emergency patients with ureteral calculi.Methods Two hundred and forty emergency patients with ureteral calculi were retrospectively analyzed,including 110 patients undergoing ESWL (ESWL group) and 130 patients undergoing URL (URL group).Results The success rate of fragmentation and calculi-free rate were 90.0% (117/130) and 80.8%(105/130) in URL group,of which were 88.2%(97/110) and 75.5%(83/110) in ESWL group with no significant difference between two groups (P > 0.05 ).The success rate of fragmentation and calculi-free rate of upper ureter in ESWL group were much better than those in URL group [93.1%(54/58) vs.84.3%(59/70),77.6% (45/58) vs.70.0% (49/70),P < 0.05 ],those of middle-lower ureter in URL group were much better than those in ESWL group [96.7%(58/60) vs.82.7%(43/52),93.3%(56/60) vs.73.1%(38/52),P<0.05].Conclusion ESWL and URL both have good curative effects in emergency patients with ureteral calculi,and ESWL has better effects for upper ureter while URL for middle-lower ureter. Key words: Ureteral calculi;  Ureteroscopes;  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the clinical effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and ureteroscope holmium laser lithotripey (URL) in emergency patients with ureteral calculi.Methods Two hundred and forty emergency patients with ureteral calculi were retrospectively analyzed,including 110 patients undergoing ESWL (ESWL group) and 130 patients undergoing URL (URL group).Results The success rate of fragmentation and calculi-free rate were 90.0% (117/130) and 80.8%(105/130) in URL group,of which were 88.2%(97/110) and 75.5%(83/110) in ESWL group with no significant difference between two groups (P > 0.05 ).The success rate of fragmentation and calculi-free rate of upper ureter in ESWL group were much better than those in URL group [93.1%(54/58) vs.84.3%(59/70),77.6% (45/58) vs.70.0% (49/70),P < 0.05 ],those of middle-lower ureter in URL group were much better than those in ESWL group [96.7%(58/60) vs.82.7%(43/52),93.3%(56/60) vs.73.1%(38/52),P<0.05].Conclusion ESWL and URL both have good curative effects in emergency patients with ureteral calculi,and ESWL has better effects for upper ureter while URL for middle-lower ureter. Key words: Ureteral calculi;  Ureteroscopes;  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy

Key concepts: Medicine, Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, Ureter, Ureteroscopy, Lithotripsy, Surgery, Urology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscope holmium laser lithotripsy in emergency patients with ureteral calculi — Research Paper | ScholarLens