Effect comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscope holmium laser lithotripsy in emergency patients with ureteral calculi
黄明坦, 叶泽兵, 梁国挺, 覃海森, 李晓峰
Abstract
黄明坦, 叶泽兵, 梁国挺, 覃海森, 李晓峰
Abstract
Objective To compare the clinical effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and ureteroscope holmium laser lithotripey (URL) in emergency patients with ureteral calculi.Methods Two hundred and forty emergency patients with ureteral calculi were retrospectively analyzed,including 110 patients undergoing ESWL (ESWL group) and 130 patients undergoing URL (URL group).Results The success rate of fragmentation and calculi-free rate were 90.0% (117/130) and 80.8%(105/130) in URL group,of which were 88.2%(97/110) and 75.5%(83/110) in ESWL group with no significant difference between two groups (P > 0.05 ).The success rate of fragmentation and calculi-free rate of upper ureter in ESWL group were much better than those in URL group [93.1%(54/58) vs.84.3%(59/70),77.6% (45/58) vs.70.0% (49/70),P < 0.05 ],those of middle-lower ureter in URL group were much better than those in ESWL group [96.7%(58/60) vs.82.7%(43/52),93.3%(56/60) vs.73.1%(38/52),P<0.05].Conclusion ESWL and URL both have good curative effects in emergency patients with ureteral calculi,and ESWL has better effects for upper ureter while URL for middle-lower ureter. Key words: Ureteral calculi; Ureteroscopes; Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To compare the clinical effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and ureteroscope holmium laser lithotripey (URL) in emergency patients with ureteral calculi.Methods Two hundred and forty emergency patients with ureteral calculi were retrospectively analyzed,including 110 patients undergoing ESWL (ESWL group) and 130 patients undergoing URL (URL group).Results The success rate of fragmentation and calculi-free rate were 90.0% (117/130) and 80.8%(105/130) in URL group,of which were 88.2%(97/110) and 75.5%(83/110) in ESWL group with no significant difference between two groups (P > 0.05 ).The success rate of fragmentation and calculi-free rate of upper ureter in ESWL group were much better than those in URL group [93.1%(54/58) vs.84.3%(59/70),77.6% (45/58) vs.70.0% (49/70),P < 0.05 ],those of middle-lower ureter in URL group were much better than those in ESWL group [96.7%(58/60) vs.82.7%(43/52),93.3%(56/60) vs.73.1%(38/52),P<0.05].Conclusion ESWL and URL both have good curative effects in emergency patients with ureteral calculi,and ESWL has better effects for upper ureter while URL for middle-lower ureter. Key words: Ureteral calculi; Ureteroscopes; Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
Key concepts: Medicine, Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, Ureter, Ureteroscopy, Lithotripsy, Surgery, Urology