2017•国际医药卫生导报Requires access
Comparison of small bone window craniotomy evacuation of hematoma and traditional craniotomy evacuation of hematoma in the treatment of cerebral hemorrhage
Jinzhi Liu
Open publisher page 0 citations
Abstract
Objective
To compare the clinical effect of small bone window craniotomy evacuation of hematoma and traditional craniotomy evacuation of hematoma in the treatment of cerebral hemorrhage (ICH).
Methods
70 cases of ICH in our hospital from June 2009 to June 2015 were divided into group A and B, 35 cases in each group. Patients in group A and B were given small bone window craniotomy evacuation of hematoma and traditional craniotomy evacuation of hematoma respectively. The treatment effect of two groups were compared.
Results
Operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, and the incidence of complications in group A were significantly less than those in group B (P<0.05). The improvement of CSS score and BI index at 6 months after operation in group A were significantly better than those in group B (P<0.05). The markedly effective rate of group A was significantly higher than that of group B (88.57% vs. 65.71%, P<0.05).
Conclusion
Small bone window craniotomy evacuation of hematoma is effective in treating ICH, can be used as the main operative treatment method for ICH.
Key words:
Cerebral hemorrhage; Small bone window craniotomy; Traditional craniotomy; Evacuation of hematoma; Curative effect