2014China Modern MedicineRequires access

Clinical experience on hematoma removal by means of craniotomy with small bone window resection in the treatment of hypertensive intracranial hematoma

Feng Yu-xi

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of small bone window craniotomy in the treatment of hypertensive intracranial hematoma. Methods A total of 84 cases of patients with hypertensive intracranial hematoma were enrolled in this study from January 2009 to December 2012 and were divided into large trauma craniotomy group(42 cases) and small bone window craniotomy group(42 cases),were treated with large trauma craniotomy and small bone window craniotomy,respectively. Average expense,average hospitalization time,the rate of complications and short-term and long-term effects,hematoma clearance,rebleeding rate were compared. Results The patients' viability(ADL classification) 21days after operation was higher in small bone window craniotomy group compared with large trauma craniotomy group(P0.05).The residual hematoma was(9±1) ml in small bone window craniotomy group,while the residual hematoma was(15±3) ml in large trauma craniotomy group,the difference was significant(P0.05).2 cases(4.76%) in small bone window craniotomy group and 8 cases(19.05%) in large trauma craniotomy group had the incident of rebleeding,the difference of two groups was significant(P0.05). Conclusion Small bone window craniotomy is better than large trauma craniotomy in the treatment of hypertensive intracranial hematoma in the area of higher curative rates and lower rebleeding rates.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of small bone window craniotomy in the treatment of hypertensive intracranial hematoma. Methods A total of 84 cases of patients with hypertensive intracranial hematoma were enrolled in this study from January 2009 to December 2012 and were divided into large trauma craniotomy group(42 cases) and small bone window craniotomy group(42 cases),were treated with large trauma craniotomy and small bone window craniotomy,respectively. Average expense,average hospitalization time,the rate of complications and short-term and long-term effects,hematoma clearance,rebleeding rate were compared. Results The patients' viability(ADL classification) 21days after operation was higher in small bone window craniotomy group compared with large trauma craniotomy group(P0.05).The residual hematoma was(9±1) ml in small bone window craniotomy group,while the residual hematoma was(15±3) ml in large trauma craniotomy group,the difference was significant(P0.05).2 cases(4.76%) in small bone window craniotomy group and 8 cases(19.05%) in large trauma craniotomy group had the incident of rebleeding,the difference of two groups was significant(P0.05). Conclusion Small bone window craniotomy is better than large trauma craniotomy in the treatment of hypertensive intracranial hematoma in the area of higher curative rates and lower rebleeding rates.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of small bone window craniotomy in the treatment of hypertensive intracranial hematoma. Methods A total of 84 cases of patients with hypertensive intracranial hematoma were enrolled in this study from January 2009 to December 2012 and were divided into large trauma craniotomy group(42 cases) and small bone window craniotomy group(42 cases),were treated with large trauma craniotomy and small bone window craniotomy,respectively. Average expense,average hospitalization time,the rate of complications and short-term and long-term effects,hematoma clearance,rebleeding rate were compared. Results The patients' viability(ADL classification) 21days after operation was higher in small bone window craniotomy group compared with large trauma craniotomy group(P0.05).The residual hematoma was(9±1) ml in small bone window craniotomy group,while the residual hematoma was(15±3) ml in large trauma craniotomy group,the difference was significant(P0.05).2 cases(4.76%) in small bone window craniotomy group and 8 cases(19.05%) in large trauma craniotomy group had the incident of rebleeding,the difference of two groups was significant(P0.05). Conclusion Small bone window craniotomy is better than large trauma craniotomy in the treatment of hypertensive intracranial hematoma in the area of higher curative rates and lower rebleeding rates.

Key concepts: Craniotomy, Medicine, Hematoma, Surgery, Significant difference, Anesthesia, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical experience on hematoma removal by means of craniotomy with small bone window resection in the treatment of hypertensive intracranial hematoma — Research Paper | ScholarLens