2018Guoji mazuixue yu fusu zazhiRequires access

Feasibility of endoscope guided orotracheal intubation without muscle relaxant

Hongwei Wang, Chenhui He, Yanqiu Ai

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the feasibility of endoscope-guided orotracheal intubation without muscle relaxant after induction of anesthesia with remifentanil and propofol. Methods Forty patients with ASA class Ⅰ or Ⅱ scheduled for elective operation under general anesthesia were randomly divided into 2 groups (n=20): subjective to endotracheal intubation without muscle relaxant(group N) or endotracheal intubation with rocuronium, a muscle relaxant (group R). Anesthesia in both groups was induced with midazolam, remifentanil, and propofol, and maintained with propofol(3 mg·kg-1·h-1) and remifentanil(0.3 μg·kg-1·min-1) after induction. When patients became unconscious with BIS<60, endotracheal intubation was performed after 2 min mechanical hyperventilation. The number of cases of successful intubation, number of attempts, duration of each attempt, total intubation time, and incidence of adverse reactions during the procedure were recorded. Results There was no difference between the two groups in the number of cases of successful intubation, number of attempts, total intubation time, adverse reactions during the procedure and the incidence of postoperative complications(P>0.05). The comprehensive satisfaction rate for the endotracheal intubation was not different in the two groups with 85% in group N and 95% in group R(P>0.05). Conclusions Endoscope-guided orotracheal intubation is safe and effective in patients without a muscle relaxant. Key words: Muscle relaxant; Endotracheal intubation; Endoscope

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the feasibility of endoscope-guided orotracheal intubation without muscle relaxant after induction of anesthesia with remifentanil and propofol. Methods Forty patients with ASA class Ⅰ or Ⅱ scheduled for elective operation under general anesthesia were randomly divided into 2 groups (n=20): subjective to endotracheal intubation without muscle relaxant(group N) or endotracheal intubation with rocuronium, a muscle relaxant (group R). Anesthesia in both groups was induced with midazolam, remifentanil, and propofol, and maintained with propofol(3 mg·kg-1·h-1) and remifentanil(0.3 μg·kg-1·min-1) after induction. When patients became unconscious with BIS<60, endotracheal intubation was performed after 2 min mechanical hyperventilation. The number of cases of successful intubation, number of attempts, duration of each attempt, total intubation time, and incidence of adverse reactions during the procedure were recorded. Results There was no difference between the two groups in the number of cases of successful intubation, number of attempts, total intubation time, adverse reactions during the procedure and the incidence of postoperative complications(P>0.05). The comprehensive satisfaction rate for the endotracheal intubation was not different in the two groups with 85% in group N and 95% in group R(P>0.05). Conclusions Endoscope-guided orotracheal intubation is safe and effective in patients without a muscle relaxant. Key words: Muscle relaxant; Endotracheal intubation; Endoscope

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the feasibility of endoscope-guided orotracheal intubation without muscle relaxant after induction of anesthesia with remifentanil and propofol. Methods Forty patients with ASA class Ⅰ or Ⅱ scheduled for elective operation under general anesthesia were randomly divided into 2 groups (n=20): subjective to endotracheal intubation without muscle relaxant(group N) or endotracheal intubation with rocuronium, a muscle relaxant (group R). Anesthesia in both groups was induced with midazolam, remifentanil, and propofol, and maintained with propofol(3 mg·kg-1·h-1) and remifentanil(0.3 μg·kg-1·min-1) after induction. When patients became unconscious with BIS<60, endotracheal intubation was performed after 2 min mechanical hyperventilation. The number of cases of successful intubation, number of attempts, duration of each attempt, total intubation time, and incidence of adverse reactions during the procedure were recorded. Results There was no difference between the two groups in the number of cases of successful intubation, number of attempts, total intubation time, adverse reactions during the procedure and the incidence of postoperative complications(P>0.05). The comprehensive satisfaction rate for the endotracheal intubation was not different in the two groups with 85% in group N and 95% in group R(P>0.05). Conclusions Endoscope-guided orotracheal intubation is safe and effective in patients without a muscle relaxant. Key words: Muscle relaxant; Endotracheal intubation; Endoscope

Key concepts: Medicine, Anesthesia, Intubation, Muscle relaxant, Propofol, Orotracheal intubation, Remifentanil, Endoscope

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Feasibility of endoscope guided orotracheal intubation without muscle relaxant — Research Paper | ScholarLens