2018Zhonghua jizhen yixue zazhiRequires access

The ratio between descending aorta and ascending aorta diameter for rapid diagnosis of Stanford type B aortic dissection

Jie Weng, Zhe Xu, Wu He, Chenchu Qu, Daqing Chen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the significance of diameter measurement in descending aorta and ascending aorta as predictors of Stanford B type aortic dissection. Methods A total of 156 patients with chest pain and 100 healthy volunteers as control were enrolled in this study. The descending aorta diameter (dDA) and ascending aorta diameter (dAA) were measured by computed tomography (CT) and CT angiography(CTA), and the ratio of dDA to dAA or to rDA(radius of descending aorta) was calculated. Various metrics were analyzed for their specificity and sensitivity as screening measurements for Stanford B type aortic dissection. Results Fifty-six cases were diagnosed with Stanford B type aortic dissection by CTA with significant increases in dDA and rDA compared with control group(P<0.05). When dDA was ≥30 mm, the sensitivity was 94.6% and specificity was 82.0% for Stanford B type aortic dissection, and when the rDA was ≥0.8, sensitivity and specificity were 96.4% and 91.0%, respectively. Conclusions The dDA≥30 mm and rDA≥0.8 may be used to predict Stanford B type aortic dissection in suspected patients with chest pain, and the latter is more accurate than the former. Key words: Stanford B aortic dissection; Descending aorta diameter; Ascending aorta diameter; Diagnosis

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate the significance of diameter measurement in descending aorta and ascending aorta as predictors of Stanford B type aortic dissection. Methods A total of 156 patients with chest pain and 100 healthy volunteers as control were enrolled in this study. The descending aorta diameter (dDA) and ascending aorta diameter (dAA) were measured by computed tomography (CT) and CT angiography(CTA), and the ratio of dDA to dAA or to rDA(radius of descending aorta) was calculated. Various metrics were analyzed for their specificity and sensitivity as screening measurements for Stanford B type aortic dissection. Results Fifty-six cases were diagnosed with Stanford B type aortic dissection by CTA with significant increases in dDA and rDA compared with control group(P<0.05). When dDA was ≥30 mm, the sensitivity was 94.6% and specificity was 82.0% for Stanford B type aortic dissection, and when the rDA was ≥0.8, sensitivity and specificity were 96.4% and 91.0%, respectively. Conclusions The dDA≥30 mm and rDA≥0.8 may be used to predict Stanford B type aortic dissection in suspected patients with chest pain, and the latter is more accurate than the former. Key words: Stanford B aortic dissection; Descending aorta diameter; Ascending aorta diameter; Diagnosis

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate the significance of diameter measurement in descending aorta and ascending aorta as predictors of Stanford B type aortic dissection. Methods A total of 156 patients with chest pain and 100 healthy volunteers as control were enrolled in this study. The descending aorta diameter (dDA) and ascending aorta diameter (dAA) were measured by computed tomography (CT) and CT angiography(CTA), and the ratio of dDA to dAA or to rDA(radius of descending aorta) was calculated. Various metrics were analyzed for their specificity and sensitivity as screening measurements for Stanford B type aortic dissection. Results Fifty-six cases were diagnosed with Stanford B type aortic dissection by CTA with significant increases in dDA and rDA compared with control group(P<0.05). When dDA was ≥30 mm, the sensitivity was 94.6% and specificity was 82.0% for Stanford B type aortic dissection, and when the rDA was ≥0.8, sensitivity and specificity were 96.4% and 91.0%, respectively. Conclusions The dDA≥30 mm and rDA≥0.8 may be used to predict Stanford B type aortic dissection in suspected patients with chest pain, and the latter is more accurate than the former. Key words: Stanford B aortic dissection; Descending aorta diameter; Ascending aorta diameter; Diagnosis

Key concepts: Medicine, Descending aorta, Ascending aorta, Aortic dissection, Aorta, Dissection (medical), Chest pain, Thoracic aorta

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The ratio between descending aorta and ascending aorta diameter for rapid diagnosis of Stanford type B aortic dissection — Research Paper | ScholarLens