2009•Zhonghua fangshe zhongliuxue zazhiRequires access

Comparison of equivalent dose between intensity modulated radiotherapy and conventional radiother-apy for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Ming-xuan Jia, Yong Cui, Tianlong Ji, Zhang Liang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To estimate and compare the equivalent dose between the intensity modula-ted radiotherapy (IMRT) and conventional radiotherapy (CR) for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods The peripheral equivalent dose of NPC patients was measured by TLD during IMRT and CR. The whole-body equivalent dose was calculated. Results When prescribed tumor dose of 70 Gy was given, the mean number of accelerator output units were 25235 MU and 8575 MU, and the whole-body e-quivalent dose were 73.65 mSy and 15.28 mSy for IMRT and CR, respectively. Conclusion The equiva-lent dose in IMRT is 4.8 times higher than that in CR for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Key words: Nasopharyngeal neoplasms;  Radiotherapy, conventional;  Radiotherapy, intensitymodulated;  Equivalent dose

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To estimate and compare the equivalent dose between the intensity modula-ted radiotherapy (IMRT) and conventional radiotherapy (CR) for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods The peripheral equivalent dose of NPC patients was measured by TLD during IMRT and CR. The whole-body equivalent dose was calculated. Results When prescribed tumor dose of 70 Gy was given, the mean number of accelerator output units were 25235 MU and 8575 MU, and the whole-body e-quivalent dose were 73.65 mSy and 15.28 mSy for IMRT and CR, respectively. Conclusion The equiva-lent dose in IMRT is 4.8 times higher than that in CR for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Key words: Nasopharyngeal neoplasms;  Radiotherapy, conventional;  Radiotherapy, intensitymodulated;  Equivalent dose

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To estimate and compare the equivalent dose between the intensity modula-ted radiotherapy (IMRT) and conventional radiotherapy (CR) for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods The peripheral equivalent dose of NPC patients was measured by TLD during IMRT and CR. The whole-body equivalent dose was calculated. Results When prescribed tumor dose of 70 Gy was given, the mean number of accelerator output units were 25235 MU and 8575 MU, and the whole-body e-quivalent dose were 73.65 mSy and 15.28 mSy for IMRT and CR, respectively. Conclusion The equiva-lent dose in IMRT is 4.8 times higher than that in CR for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Key words: Nasopharyngeal neoplasms;  Radiotherapy, conventional;  Radiotherapy, intensitymodulated;  Equivalent dose

Key concepts: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Radiation therapy, Equivalent dose, Medicine, Nuclear medicine, Thermoluminescent dosimeter, Radiology, Dosimetry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of equivalent dose between intensity modulated radiotherapy and conventional radiother-apy for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma — Research Paper | ScholarLens