2009•Modern Medicine HealthRequires access

Comparison of side effects of intensity modulated radiotherapy and conventional radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Liao Kui

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To compare the side effects of intensity modulated radiotherapy(IMRT) and conventional radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Methods:Among 118 cases of nasopharyngeal carcinoma,there were 61 of IMRT and 57 of conventional radiotherapy.The target areas in IMRT were nasopharyngeal carcinoma,parapharyngeal space and neck lymphatic area with the fractional dose of 2.0~2.5 Gy/time,for 33 times.The conventional radiotherapy group was given face-neck joint radiation,DT 40~60 Gy,20~30 times for 4~6 weeks.The reinforcing dosage in pre-auricular field increased to DT 70 GY in the nasopharyngeal area.The total amount of neck prevention was DT 50~55 Gy.Results:The 1-year dry mouth incidence in the IMRT and conventional radiotherapy groups was 8.20%(5/ 61) and 94.73%(54/%57) respectively,the incidence of difficulty in opening mouth in the IMRT and conventional radiotherapy groups was 4.92%(3/61) and 71.93%(41/57) respectively.There was significant difference between the two groups(P0.01).Conclusion:IMRT decreases obviously the side effects compared with the conventional radiotherapy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To compare the side effects of intensity modulated radiotherapy(IMRT) and conventional radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Methods:Among 118 cases of nasopharyngeal carcinoma,there were 61 of IMRT and 57 of conventional radiotherapy.The target areas in IMRT were nasopharyngeal carcinoma,parapharyngeal space and neck lymphatic area with the fractional dose of 2.0~2.5 Gy/time,for 33 times.The conventional radiotherapy group was given face-neck joint radiation,DT 40~60 Gy,20~30 times for 4~6 weeks.The reinforcing dosage in pre-auricular field increased to DT 70 GY in the nasopharyngeal area.The total amount of neck prevention was DT 50~55 Gy.Results:The 1-year dry mouth incidence in the IMRT and conventional radiotherapy groups was 8.20%(5/ 61) and 94.73%(54/%57) respectively,the incidence of difficulty in opening mouth in the IMRT and conventional radiotherapy groups was 4.92%(3/61) and 71.93%(41/57) respectively.There was significant difference between the two groups(P0.01).Conclusion:IMRT decreases obviously the side effects compared with the conventional radiotherapy.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To compare the side effects of intensity modulated radiotherapy(IMRT) and conventional radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Methods:Among 118 cases of nasopharyngeal carcinoma,there were 61 of IMRT and 57 of conventional radiotherapy.The target areas in IMRT were nasopharyngeal carcinoma,parapharyngeal space and neck lymphatic area with the fractional dose of 2.0~2.5 Gy/time,for 33 times.The conventional radiotherapy group was given face-neck joint radiation,DT 40~60 Gy,20~30 times for 4~6 weeks.The reinforcing dosage in pre-auricular field increased to DT 70 GY in the nasopharyngeal area.The total amount of neck prevention was DT 50~55 Gy.Results:The 1-year dry mouth incidence in the IMRT and conventional radiotherapy groups was 8.20%(5/ 61) and 94.73%(54/%57) respectively,the incidence of difficulty in opening mouth in the IMRT and conventional radiotherapy groups was 4.92%(3/61) and 71.93%(41/57) respectively.There was significant difference between the two groups(P0.01).Conclusion:IMRT decreases obviously the side effects compared with the conventional radiotherapy.

Key concepts: Medicine, Nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Radiation therapy, Nuclear medicine, Parapharyngeal space, Carcinoma, Radiology, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of side effects of intensity modulated radiotherapy and conventional radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma — Research Paper | ScholarLens