2012Chin J Postgrad MedRequires access

Effect of dexmedetomidine and midazolam on hemodynamics and sedation in patients with nasal intubation

徐雪, 戚翔, 梁治, 张晓青, 董振明

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To study the effect of dexmedetomidine and midazolam on hemodynamics and sedation in patients with nasal intubation.Methods Forty patients whose ASA grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ and anticipated difficult airway were randomly divided into dexmedetomidine group(group D,20 cases)and midazolam group(group M,20 cases)according to the admission number.In group D,dexmedetomidine 1 μ g/kg were constant speed pumped in 10 minutes.In group M,midazolam 0.03 mg/kg were intravenous injected.Then nasal intubation were carried.Systolic blood pressure(SBP),diastolic blood pressure(DBP),mean arterial blood pressure(MAP),heart rate(HR),pulse oxygen saturation(SpO2),Ramsay sedation score,rate-pressure product(RPP),tip perfusion index(TPI)were recorded and compared before anesthesia (T0),fiberoptic bronchoscope pass by later nostril(T1),to spy on epiglottis(T2),intubation succeed(T3),after intubation 1 minute(T4)and after intubation 3 minutes(T5).Airway score and postoperative visit were evaluated.Results SBP,DBP,MAP,HR,RPP in group M were significantly higher at T1-T3 than those at T0 (P<0.05),and were significantly higher than those in group D at the same time(P< 0.05).There was no significant difference in group D(P > 0.05).Ramsay sedation score and TPI at T1-T3 in group M were significantly lower than those at To(P <0.05).Ramsay sedation score and TPI at T1-T5 in group D were significantly higher than those at T0(P < 0.05),and were significantly higher than those in group M at the same time(P < 0.05).The rate of airway score 1 score and intubation satisfaction in group D were significantly higher than those in group M[100%(20/20)vs.30%(6/20),90%(18/20)vs.50%(10/20)](P< 0.05).The rate of throat ache in group D was significantly lower than that in group M[5%(1/20)vs.35%(7/20)](P <0.05).Conclusions For difficult airway patients with nasal intubation during dexmedetomidine infusion,hemodynamics is stable and sedation is satisfied. Key words: Catheterization;  Hemodynamic processes;  Conscious sedation;  Dexmedetomidine; Diffcult airway

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To study the effect of dexmedetomidine and midazolam on hemodynamics and sedation in patients with nasal intubation.Methods Forty patients whose ASA grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ and anticipated difficult airway were randomly divided into dexmedetomidine group(group D,20 cases)and midazolam group(group M,20 cases)according to the admission number.In group D,dexmedetomidine 1 μ g/kg were constant speed pumped in 10 minutes.In group M,midazolam 0.03 mg/kg were intravenous injected.Then nasal intubation were carried.Systolic blood pressure(SBP),diastolic blood pressure(DBP),mean arterial blood pressure(MAP),heart rate(HR),pulse oxygen saturation(SpO2),Ramsay sedation score,rate-pressure product(RPP),tip perfusion index(TPI)were recorded and compared before anesthesia (T0),fiberoptic bronchoscope pass by later nostril(T1),to spy on epiglottis(T2),intubation succeed(T3),after intubation 1 minute(T4)and after intubation 3 minutes(T5).Airway score and postoperative visit were evaluated.Results SBP,DBP,MAP,HR,RPP in group M were significantly higher at T1-T3 than those at T0 (P<0.05),and were significantly higher than those in group D at the same time(P< 0.05).There was no significant difference in group D(P > 0.05).Ramsay sedation score and TPI at T1-T3 in group M were significantly lower than those at To(P <0.05).Ramsay sedation score and TPI at T1-T5 in group D were significantly higher than those at T0(P < 0.05),and were significantly higher than those in group M at the same time(P < 0.05).The rate of airway score 1 score and intubation satisfaction in group D were significantly higher than those in group M[100%(20/20)vs.30%(6/20),90%(18/20)vs.50%(10/20)](P< 0.05).The rate of throat ache in group D was significantly lower than that in group M[5%(1/20)vs.35%(7/20)](P <0.05).Conclusions For difficult airway patients with nasal intubation during dexmedetomidine infusion,hemodynamics is stable and sedation is satisfied. Key words: Catheterization;  Hemodynamic processes;  Conscious sedation;  Dexmedetomidine; Diffcult airway

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To study the effect of dexmedetomidine and midazolam on hemodynamics and sedation in patients with nasal intubation.Methods Forty patients whose ASA grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ and anticipated difficult airway were randomly divided into dexmedetomidine group(group D,20 cases)and midazolam group(group M,20 cases)according to the admission number.In group D,dexmedetomidine 1 μ g/kg were constant speed pumped in 10 minutes.In group M,midazolam 0.03 mg/kg were intravenous injected.Then nasal intubation were carried.Systolic blood pressure(SBP),diastolic blood pressure(DBP),mean arterial blood pressure(MAP),heart rate(HR),pulse oxygen saturation(SpO2),Ramsay sedation score,rate-pressure product(RPP),tip perfusion index(TPI)were recorded and compared before anesthesia (T0),fiberoptic bronchoscope pass by later nostril(T1),to spy on epiglottis(T2),intubation succeed(T3),after intubation 1 minute(T4)and after intubation 3 minutes(T5).Airway score and postoperative visit were evaluated.Results SBP,DBP,MAP,HR,RPP in group M were significantly higher at T1-T3 than those at T0 (P<0.05),and were significantly higher than those in group D at the same time(P< 0.05).There was no significant difference in group D(P > 0.05).Ramsay sedation score and TPI at T1-T3 in group M were significantly lower than those at To(P <0.05).Ramsay sedation score and TPI at T1-T5 in group D were significantly higher than those at T0(P < 0.05),and were significantly higher than those in group M at the same time(P < 0.05).The rate of airway score 1 score and intubation satisfaction in group D were significantly higher than those in group M[100%(20/20)vs.30%(6/20),90%(18/20)vs.50%(10/20)](P< 0.05).The rate of throat ache in group D was significantly lower than that in group M[5%(1/20)vs.35%(7/20)](P <0.05).Conclusions For difficult airway patients with nasal intubation during dexmedetomidine infusion,hemodynamics is stable and sedation is satisfied. Key words: Catheterization;  Hemodynamic processes;  Conscious sedation;  Dexmedetomidine; Diffcult airway

Key concepts: Dexmedetomidine, Anesthesia, Midazolam, Sedation, Medicine, Intubation, Blood pressure, Heart rate

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of dexmedetomidine and midazolam on hemodynamics and sedation in patients with nasal intubation — Research Paper | ScholarLens