2017˜The œJournal of practical nursingRequires access

Comparison of the effect between enteral nutrition and parenteral nutrition among elderly patients with critical pulmonary infection

Min Dan, Min-Hui Cai, Min Chen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the effect between enteral nutrition and parenteral nutrition among elderly patients with critical pulmonary infection. Methods A total of 60 elderly patients with critical pulmonary infection from October 2011 to May 2014 were randomly divided into enteral nutrition group and parenteral nutrition group with 30 cases each. After 2 weeks of nutritional support, the nutritional status, liver function, complications, hospitalization costs and time were compared. Results Hemoglobin, albumin, prealbumin, total protein was (136.20±3.53) g/L, (40.25±1.65) g/L, (95.97±4.22) mg/L, (75.30±5.30) g/L in enteral nutrition group and (128.10±4.22) g/L, (36.80±1.17) g/L, (84.08±4.86) mg/L, (63.76±6.92) g/L in parenteral nutrition group, there was significant difference between 2 groups (t=24.36-83.76, all P<0.01). Alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin was (57.47±9.08), (33.53±4.21), (13.82±2.59), (5.66±1.22) μmol/L in enteral nutrition group and (75.77±6.96), (47.93±8.28), (24.70±6.44), (14.77±2.77) μmol/L in parenteral nutrition group, there was significant difference between 2 groups(t=30.90-305.34, all P<0.01). The complications of enteral nutrition group in intestinal infection rate was 10.0% (3/30), urinary tract infection was 13.3% (4/30), constipation was 6.7%(2/30), and parenteral nutrition group were 36.7%(11/30), 33.3%(10/30), 63.3%(19/30), the difference between 2 groups was statistically significant (χ2=5.96, 3.35, 21.17, all P<0.05). The hospitalization costs and the hospitalization time was (3 345.00±617.80) yuan, (18.00±3.70) d in enteral nutrition group and (7 617.00±870.76) yuan, (28.00±5.67) d in parenteral nutrition group, the difference between 2 groups was statistical significance (t=2 779.11, 27.31, all P<0.05). Conclusions Early enteral nutrition or transit parenteral nutrition to enteral nutrition should be applied among elderly patients with critical pulmonary infection in order to improve nutritional status, enhance immunity, reduce complication, and promote recovery. Key words: Eldly; Critical pulmonary infection; Parenteral nutrition; Enteral nutrition

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the effect between enteral nutrition and parenteral nutrition among elderly patients with critical pulmonary infection. Methods A total of 60 elderly patients with critical pulmonary infection from October 2011 to May 2014 were randomly divided into enteral nutrition group and parenteral nutrition group with 30 cases each. After 2 weeks of nutritional support, the nutritional status, liver function, complications, hospitalization costs and time were compared. Results Hemoglobin, albumin, prealbumin, total protein was (136.20±3.53) g/L, (40.25±1.65) g/L, (95.97±4.22) mg/L, (75.30±5.30) g/L in enteral nutrition group and (128.10±4.22) g/L, (36.80±1.17) g/L, (84.08±4.86) mg/L, (63.76±6.92) g/L in parenteral nutrition group, there was significant difference between 2 groups (t=24.36-83.76, all P<0.01). Alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin was (57.47±9.08), (33.53±4.21), (13.82±2.59), (5.66±1.22) μmol/L in enteral nutrition group and (75.77±6.96), (47.93±8.28), (24.70±6.44), (14.77±2.77) μmol/L in parenteral nutrition group, there was significant difference between 2 groups(t=30.90-305.34, all P<0.01). The complications of enteral nutrition group in intestinal infection rate was 10.0% (3/30), urinary tract infection was 13.3% (4/30), constipation was 6.7%(2/30), and parenteral nutrition group were 36.7%(11/30), 33.3%(10/30), 63.3%(19/30), the difference between 2 groups was statistically significant (χ2=5.96, 3.35, 21.17, all P<0.05). The hospitalization costs and the hospitalization time was (3 345.00±617.80) yuan, (18.00±3.70) d in enteral nutrition group and (7 617.00±870.76) yuan, (28.00±5.67) d in parenteral nutrition group, the difference between 2 groups was statistical significance (t=2 779.11, 27.31, all P<0.05). Conclusions Early enteral nutrition or transit parenteral nutrition to enteral nutrition should be applied among elderly patients with critical pulmonary infection in order to improve nutritional status, enhance immunity, reduce complication, and promote recovery. Key words: Eldly; Critical pulmonary infection; Parenteral nutrition; Enteral nutrition

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the effect between enteral nutrition and parenteral nutrition among elderly patients with critical pulmonary infection. Methods A total of 60 elderly patients with critical pulmonary infection from October 2011 to May 2014 were randomly divided into enteral nutrition group and parenteral nutrition group with 30 cases each. After 2 weeks of nutritional support, the nutritional status, liver function, complications, hospitalization costs and time were compared. Results Hemoglobin, albumin, prealbumin, total protein was (136.20±3.53) g/L, (40.25±1.65) g/L, (95.97±4.22) mg/L, (75.30±5.30) g/L in enteral nutrition group and (128.10±4.22) g/L, (36.80±1.17) g/L, (84.08±4.86) mg/L, (63.76±6.92) g/L in parenteral nutrition group, there was significant difference between 2 groups (t=24.36-83.76, all P<0.01). Alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin was (57.47±9.08), (33.53±4.21), (13.82±2.59), (5.66±1.22) μmol/L in enteral nutrition group and (75.77±6.96), (47.93±8.28), (24.70±6.44), (14.77±2.77) μmol/L in parenteral nutrition group, there was significant difference between 2 groups(t=30.90-305.34, all P<0.01). The complications of enteral nutrition group in intestinal infection rate was 10.0% (3/30), urinary tract infection was 13.3% (4/30), constipation was 6.7%(2/30), and parenteral nutrition group were 36.7%(11/30), 33.3%(10/30), 63.3%(19/30), the difference between 2 groups was statistically significant (χ2=5.96, 3.35, 21.17, all P<0.05). The hospitalization costs and the hospitalization time was (3 345.00±617.80) yuan, (18.00±3.70) d in enteral nutrition group and (7 617.00±870.76) yuan, (28.00±5.67) d in parenteral nutrition group, the difference between 2 groups was statistical significance (t=2 779.11, 27.31, all P<0.05). Conclusions Early enteral nutrition or transit parenteral nutrition to enteral nutrition should be applied among elderly patients with critical pulmonary infection in order to improve nutritional status, enhance immunity, reduce complication, and promote recovery. Key words: Eldly; Critical pulmonary infection; Parenteral nutrition; Enteral nutrition

Key concepts: Parenteral nutrition, Medicine, Gastroenterology, Internal medicine, Bilirubin, Enteral administration, Albumin, Constipation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of the effect between enteral nutrition and parenteral nutrition among elderly patients with critical pulmonary infection — Research Paper | ScholarLens