2010Zhongguo jiceng yiyaoRequires access

Effect of different anesthesia methods on hemodynamics in gynecological laparoscopic operation

Hai-ying Zhu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To observe the effects of peridural and general anesthesia on haemodynamics in gynecological laparoscopic operation.Methods 106 patients with gynecological laparoscopic operation were randomly divided into epidural anesthesia group(n=53)and general anesthesia group(n=53)respectively.The changes of heart rate(HR),systolic blood pressure(SBP),diastolic blood pressure(DBP),SPO_2 were monitored before anesthesia,at 20min after pneumoperitoneum(pp),end of operation.Results The sober time in epidural anesthrsia geoup(7.1 ±2.5)min was significantly faster than that in general anesthesia group(20.8 ± 6.3)min(t=2.068,P<0.05).At 20min after pp,HR in general anesthesia group(91 ±17)was significantly faster than that in ppidural anesthesia group before anesthesia(t=2.593,P<0.05),and it was significantly higher than epidural anesthesia group(t=3.417,P<0.05).SBP in epidural anesthesia group was singnificantly lower than before anesthesia(t=2.806,P<0.05),and it was significantly lower than general anesthesia group(t=3.917,P<0.05).Conclusion General anesthesia does not significantly better than epidural anesthesia in gynecological laparoscopic operation,but they should enhance the clinical monitoring of hemodynamics. Key words: Anesthesia,epidural; Anesthesia,general; Laparpseopy; Hemodynamic phenomena

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To observe the effects of peridural and general anesthesia on haemodynamics in gynecological laparoscopic operation.Methods 106 patients with gynecological laparoscopic operation were randomly divided into epidural anesthesia group(n=53)and general anesthesia group(n=53)respectively.The changes of heart rate(HR),systolic blood pressure(SBP),diastolic blood pressure(DBP),SPO_2 were monitored before anesthesia,at 20min after pneumoperitoneum(pp),end of operation.Results The sober time in epidural anesthrsia geoup(7.1 ±2.5)min was significantly faster than that in general anesthesia group(20.8 ± 6.3)min(t=2.068,P<0.05).At 20min after pp,HR in general anesthesia group(91 ±17)was significantly faster than that in ppidural anesthesia group before anesthesia(t=2.593,P<0.05),and it was significantly higher than epidural anesthesia group(t=3.417,P<0.05).SBP in epidural anesthesia group was singnificantly lower than before anesthesia(t=2.806,P<0.05),and it was significantly lower than general anesthesia group(t=3.917,P<0.05).Conclusion General anesthesia does not significantly better than epidural anesthesia in gynecological laparoscopic operation,but they should enhance the clinical monitoring of hemodynamics. Key words: Anesthesia,epidural; Anesthesia,general; Laparpseopy; Hemodynamic phenomena

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To observe the effects of peridural and general anesthesia on haemodynamics in gynecological laparoscopic operation.Methods 106 patients with gynecological laparoscopic operation were randomly divided into epidural anesthesia group(n=53)and general anesthesia group(n=53)respectively.The changes of heart rate(HR),systolic blood pressure(SBP),diastolic blood pressure(DBP),SPO_2 were monitored before anesthesia,at 20min after pneumoperitoneum(pp),end of operation.Results The sober time in epidural anesthrsia geoup(7.1 ±2.5)min was significantly faster than that in general anesthesia group(20.8 ± 6.3)min(t=2.068,P<0.05).At 20min after pp,HR in general anesthesia group(91 ±17)was significantly faster than that in ppidural anesthesia group before anesthesia(t=2.593,P<0.05),and it was significantly higher than epidural anesthesia group(t=3.417,P<0.05).SBP in epidural anesthesia group was singnificantly lower than before anesthesia(t=2.806,P<0.05),and it was significantly lower than general anesthesia group(t=3.917,P<0.05).Conclusion General anesthesia does not significantly better than epidural anesthesia in gynecological laparoscopic operation,but they should enhance the clinical monitoring of hemodynamics. Key words: Anesthesia,epidural; Anesthesia,general; Laparpseopy; Hemodynamic phenomena

Key concepts: Medicine, Pneumoperitoneum, Anesthesia, Hemodynamics, Blood pressure, Heart rate, Surgery, Laparoscopy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of different anesthesia methods on hemodynamics in gynecological laparoscopic operation — Research Paper | ScholarLens