2011Chin Arch Gen Surg(Electronic Edition)Requires access

Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of parenteral nutrition and enteral nutrition in acute pancreatitis

Chun-ling Xie, Zhicheng Hu, Bin Zhu, Bing Tang, Dong Guo, Bin Chen, Kai Zhang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To analyze the effects of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and enteral nutri- tion (EN) in patients with acute pancreatitis. Methods Electronic databases from January 1966 to March 2011 about randomized controlled trial of nutrition therapy in patients with acute pancreatitis were enrolled and Meta-analysis of these randomized controlled trial was used, the measurement index were morbidity, infection rate, multiple organ failure (MOF) rate, surgery intervention rate and length of stay. Results A total of 13 trials was included. Compared with conventional parenteral nutrition, morbidity of enteral nutrition in patients with acute pancreatitis reduced by 61% (95% CI = 24%~63%, P = 0.0001) , and infection rate reduced by 45% (95% CI = 38%~79%, P < 0.01) , and the multiple organ failure reduced by 69% (95% CI = 20%~48%, P < 0.01) , and the surgery intervention reduced by 73% (95% CI = 18%~42%, P < 0.01) . However, there was no statistically significant about the length of stay between EN and PN. Conclusions In patients with acute pancreatitis, enteral nutrition significantly reduced mortality, infections, multiple organ failure and surgery intervention compared to those who received TPN. This data suggests that EN should be considered the better way for patients with acute pancreatitis requiring nutritional support. Key words: Meta-analysis; Acute pancreatitis; Enteral nutrition; Parenteral nutrition

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To analyze the effects of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and enteral nutri- tion (EN) in patients with acute pancreatitis. Methods Electronic databases from January 1966 to March 2011 about randomized controlled trial of nutrition therapy in patients with acute pancreatitis were enrolled and Meta-analysis of these randomized controlled trial was used, the measurement index were morbidity, infection rate, multiple organ failure (MOF) rate, surgery intervention rate and length of stay. Results A total of 13 trials was included. Compared with conventional parenteral nutrition, morbidity of enteral nutrition in patients with acute pancreatitis reduced by 61% (95% CI = 24%~63%, P = 0.0001) , and infection rate reduced by 45% (95% CI = 38%~79%, P < 0.01) , and the multiple organ failure reduced by 69% (95% CI = 20%~48%, P < 0.01) , and the surgery intervention reduced by 73% (95% CI = 18%~42%, P < 0.01) . However, there was no statistically significant about the length of stay between EN and PN. Conclusions In patients with acute pancreatitis, enteral nutrition significantly reduced mortality, infections, multiple organ failure and surgery intervention compared to those who received TPN. This data suggests that EN should be considered the better way for patients with acute pancreatitis requiring nutritional support. Key words: Meta-analysis; Acute pancreatitis; Enteral nutrition; Parenteral nutrition

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To analyze the effects of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and enteral nutri- tion (EN) in patients with acute pancreatitis. Methods Electronic databases from January 1966 to March 2011 about randomized controlled trial of nutrition therapy in patients with acute pancreatitis were enrolled and Meta-analysis of these randomized controlled trial was used, the measurement index were morbidity, infection rate, multiple organ failure (MOF) rate, surgery intervention rate and length of stay. Results A total of 13 trials was included. Compared with conventional parenteral nutrition, morbidity of enteral nutrition in patients with acute pancreatitis reduced by 61% (95% CI = 24%~63%, P = 0.0001) , and infection rate reduced by 45% (95% CI = 38%~79%, P < 0.01) , and the multiple organ failure reduced by 69% (95% CI = 20%~48%, P < 0.01) , and the surgery intervention reduced by 73% (95% CI = 18%~42%, P < 0.01) . However, there was no statistically significant about the length of stay between EN and PN. Conclusions In patients with acute pancreatitis, enteral nutrition significantly reduced mortality, infections, multiple organ failure and surgery intervention compared to those who received TPN. This data suggests that EN should be considered the better way for patients with acute pancreatitis requiring nutritional support. Key words: Meta-analysis; Acute pancreatitis; Enteral nutrition; Parenteral nutrition

Key concepts: Parenteral nutrition, Acute pancreatitis, Medicine, Pancreatitis, Randomized controlled trial, Internal medicine, Enteral administration, Clinical nutrition

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of parenteral nutrition and enteral nutrition in acute pancreatitis — Research Paper | ScholarLens