2017中国医师杂志Requires access

The clinical healing effect of vacuum sealing drainage technique using in treatment of deep burn wound

Weihai Su

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To explore the healing effect of vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) technique using in treatment of deep burn wound. Methods Patients were selected who hospitalized in our hospital because of burn from June 2014 to May 2016, and divided into the VSD group and silver sulfadiazine (SD-Ag) group. The incidence of wound infection, bacterial culture positive rate and wound visual analogue score (VAS) were compared between two groups of patients in different time after burn, and also compared two groups of patients with wound healing time, and incidence of scar and the scar rating scale of vancouver. Results A total of 80 patients were included in the study, and divided into VSD (n=46) and SD-Ag (n=34) groups. The wound infection rate and bacterial culture positive rate in the VSD group were significantly lower than the SD-Ag group after burn for 7 d, 14 d, and 21 d (P<0.05). Patient's wound pain VAS score in the VSD group was less than SD-Ag group after burn for 7 d, 14 d, and 21 d (P<0.05). The wound healing time, incidence of scar, and vancouver scar table score in the VSD group were significantly lower than that of SD-Ag group (P<0.05). Conclusions The use of vacuum sealing drainage of treatment for burn patients can significantly reduce the wound infection, relieve wound pain, promote wound healing, and reduce scar occurred at the same time. Key words: Negative-pressure wound therapy; Burns/TH; Wound healing

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To explore the healing effect of vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) technique using in treatment of deep burn wound. Methods Patients were selected who hospitalized in our hospital because of burn from June 2014 to May 2016, and divided into the VSD group and silver sulfadiazine (SD-Ag) group. The incidence of wound infection, bacterial culture positive rate and wound visual analogue score (VAS) were compared between two groups of patients in different time after burn, and also compared two groups of patients with wound healing time, and incidence of scar and the scar rating scale of vancouver. Results A total of 80 patients were included in the study, and divided into VSD (n=46) and SD-Ag (n=34) groups. The wound infection rate and bacterial culture positive rate in the VSD group were significantly lower than the SD-Ag group after burn for 7 d, 14 d, and 21 d (P<0.05). Patient's wound pain VAS score in the VSD group was less than SD-Ag group after burn for 7 d, 14 d, and 21 d (P<0.05). The wound healing time, incidence of scar, and vancouver scar table score in the VSD group were significantly lower than that of SD-Ag group (P<0.05). Conclusions The use of vacuum sealing drainage of treatment for burn patients can significantly reduce the wound infection, relieve wound pain, promote wound healing, and reduce scar occurred at the same time. Key words: Negative-pressure wound therapy; Burns/TH; Wound healing

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To explore the healing effect of vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) technique using in treatment of deep burn wound. Methods Patients were selected who hospitalized in our hospital because of burn from June 2014 to May 2016, and divided into the VSD group and silver sulfadiazine (SD-Ag) group. The incidence of wound infection, bacterial culture positive rate and wound visual analogue score (VAS) were compared between two groups of patients in different time after burn, and also compared two groups of patients with wound healing time, and incidence of scar and the scar rating scale of vancouver. Results A total of 80 patients were included in the study, and divided into VSD (n=46) and SD-Ag (n=34) groups. The wound infection rate and bacterial culture positive rate in the VSD group were significantly lower than the SD-Ag group after burn for 7 d, 14 d, and 21 d (P<0.05). Patient's wound pain VAS score in the VSD group was less than SD-Ag group after burn for 7 d, 14 d, and 21 d (P<0.05). The wound healing time, incidence of scar, and vancouver scar table score in the VSD group were significantly lower than that of SD-Ag group (P<0.05). Conclusions The use of vacuum sealing drainage of treatment for burn patients can significantly reduce the wound infection, relieve wound pain, promote wound healing, and reduce scar occurred at the same time. Key words: Negative-pressure wound therapy; Burns/TH; Wound healing

Key concepts: Medicine, Silver sulfadiazine, Wound healing, Burn wound, Surgery, Incidence (geometry), Negative-pressure wound therapy, Anesthesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The clinical healing effect of vacuum sealing drainage technique using in treatment of deep burn wound — Research Paper | ScholarLens