The clinical investigation of retention respiration intubation general anesthesia in craniocerebral operation
牛建录, 王珑, 王宏
Abstract
牛建录, 王珑, 王宏
Abstract
Objective To study the effect and safety on the retention respiratory inhalation general anesthesia in craniocerebral operation.Methods Eighty-six patients undergoing craniocerebral operation were divided into conventional anesthesia group (group A) and retention respiratory anesthesia group (group B) by random digits table method with 43 cases each.Group A was given conventional induction and intubation,administration order:midazolam 0.05 mg/kg,fentanyl 2-4 μ g/kg,cisatracurium 0.2-0.3 mg/kg,propofol 1.0-1.5 mg/kg;group B was given rapid induction and intubation,administration order:midazolam 0.05 mg/kg,fentanyl 2-4 μg/kg,propofol 1.0-1.5 mg/kg,succinylcholine 1.5 mg/kg.The 2 groups after intubation done by Ohmeda 7100 anesthesia machine control respiration,trace pump continuous infusion of propofol and remifentanil,and maintained inhaling isoflurane anesthesia.Group A was discontinuity intravenous injection atracurium.Group B was changed autonomous breathing after the succinylcholine effect disappeared,respiratory frequency according to the regulation of remifentanil infusion rate,the respiration rate remained at 8-12 times/min.The consumption of propofol and remifentanil,additional times of fentanyl,intraoperative airway pressure,partial pressure of carbon dioxide in end expiratory gas (PE TCO2),intraoperative body movement,airway pressure,extubation time,OAA/S score after extubation 15 min and untoward reaction were recorded.Results There were no statistical differences in operation time,intraoperative body movement,intraoperative airway pressure and PETCO2 between the 2 groups (P> 0.05).The consumption of propofol and remifentanil,additional times of fentanyl in group B were significantly higher than those in group A [(69.2 ± 13.7) μg/(kg·min) vs.(61.0 ± 8.2)μg/(kg·min),(0.19 ± 0.06) μ g/ (kg· min) vs.(0.15 ± 0.05) μ g/ (kg· min),1.5 times vs.0 time],there were statistical differences (P< 0.05).The extubation time in group B was significantly shorter than that in group A [(6.4 ±3.2) min vs.(11.3 ± 4.5) min],the OAA/S score after extubation 15 min in group B was significantly lower than that in group A [1 (1-3) scores vs.2(1-3) scores],there were statistical differences between the 2 groups (P < 0.05).Conclusion Retention respiration intubation general anesthesia patients of craniocerebral operation can early recover,extubation time is significantly shorter,it is a safe and effective anesthesia method. Key words: Anesthesia,general; Craniocerebral operation; Keep respiration
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To study the effect and safety on the retention respiratory inhalation general anesthesia in craniocerebral operation.Methods Eighty-six patients undergoing craniocerebral operation were divided into conventional anesthesia group (group A) and retention respiratory anesthesia group (group B) by random digits table method with 43 cases each.Group A was given conventional induction and intubation,administration order:midazolam 0.05 mg/kg,fentanyl 2-4 μ g/kg,cisatracurium 0.2-0.3 mg/kg,propofol 1.0-1.5 mg/kg;group B was given rapid induction and intubation,administration order:midazolam 0.05 mg/kg,fentanyl 2-4 μg/kg,propofol 1.0-1.5 mg/kg,succinylcholine 1.5 mg/kg.The 2 groups after intubation done by Ohmeda 7100 anesthesia machine control respiration,trace pump continuous infusion of propofol and remifentanil,and maintained inhaling isoflurane anesthesia.Group A was discontinuity intravenous injection atracurium.Group B was changed autonomous breathing after the succinylcholine effect disappeared,respiratory frequency according to the regulation of remifentanil infusion rate,the respiration rate remained at 8-12 times/min.The consumption of propofol and remifentanil,additional times of fentanyl,intraoperative airway pressure,partial pressure of carbon dioxide in end expiratory gas (PE TCO2),intraoperative body movement,airway pressure,extubation time,OAA/S score after extubation 15 min and untoward reaction were recorded.Results There were no statistical differences in operation time,intraoperative body movement,intraoperative airway pressure and PETCO2 between the 2 groups (P> 0.05).The consumption of propofol and remifentanil,additional times of fentanyl in group B were significantly higher than those in group A [(69.2 ± 13.7) μg/(kg·min) vs.(61.0 ± 8.2)μg/(kg·min),(0.19 ± 0.06) μ g/ (kg· min) vs.(0.15 ± 0.05) μ g/ (kg· min),1.5 times vs.0 time],there were statistical differences (P< 0.05).The extubation time in group B was significantly shorter than that in group A [(6.4 ±3.2) min vs.(11.3 ± 4.5) min],the OAA/S score after extubation 15 min in group B was significantly lower than that in group A [1 (1-3) scores vs.2(1-3) scores],there were statistical differences between the 2 groups (P < 0.05).Conclusion Retention respiration intubation general anesthesia patients of craniocerebral operation can early recover,extubation time is significantly shorter,it is a safe and effective anesthesia method. Key words: Anesthesia,general; Craniocerebral operation; Keep respiration
Key concepts: Propofol, Anesthesia, Fentanyl, Midazolam, Remifentanil, Medicine, Intubation, Isoflurane