2018•Zhonghua miniao waike zazhiRequires access

The value of urodynamic examination in treating the patient with prostatic hyperplasia accompany with dysfunction of the bladder

Huichong Yu, Dahai Yu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the value of urodynamic in treating those patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia complicated with bladder dysfunction. Methods 130 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia were retrospectively reviewed between December 2015 and December 2016. The exclusive criteria included nervous system diseases, moderate to severe diabetes, moderate to severe hypertension, urethral stricture, bladder stones, prostate cancer, etc. The patient's age is ranged 51 to 92, mean 72 years old. The previous history of disease ranged from 3 months to 15 years, mean 4 years. All patients accepted the urodynamic examination. Different treatments were considered according to urodynamic studies. Results According to the classification of bladder outlet obstruction, 130 cases were classified as bladder outlet obstruction in 109 cases, bladder suspicious obstruction in 15 cases, no bladder obstruction in 6 cases. According to the classification of bladder function, 130 cases were divided into unstable bladder in 6 cases, low compliance bladder in 7 cases, bladder atony in 15 cases, bladder without tension in 3 cases, normal bladder function in 99 cases. 3 cases without bladder tension, including BOO in 2 cases, suspected BOO in 1 case, were accepted the cystostomy. 15 cases with less detrusor contraction, including BOO in 4 cases, suspected BOO in 9 cases, were accepted the cystostomy and TURP. Conservative treatment was performed in other 2 cases without obstruction. In 6 cases with unstable bladder, 2 cases without obstruction accepted the conservative treatment, 4 cases with suspected BOO accepted the TURP. In 7 patients with low compliance bladder, 2 cases without obstruction accepted the conservative treatment, 5 cases with suspected BOO accepted the TURP. The duration of following up was 3-6 months. The symptoms of the patients in this group improved significantly during following up. Conclusion For patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia complicated with bladder dysfunction, the results of urodynamics can help to choose the right treatment and improve effect of treatment. Key words: Urodynamic; Transurethral resection of prostate; Bladder dysfunction

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate the value of urodynamic in treating those patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia complicated with bladder dysfunction. Methods 130 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia were retrospectively reviewed between December 2015 and December 2016. The exclusive criteria included nervous system diseases, moderate to severe diabetes, moderate to severe hypertension, urethral stricture, bladder stones, prostate cancer, etc. The patient's age is ranged 51 to 92, mean 72 years old. The previous history of disease ranged from 3 months to 15 years, mean 4 years. All patients accepted the urodynamic examination. Different treatments were considered according to urodynamic studies. Results According to the classification of bladder outlet obstruction, 130 cases were classified as bladder outlet obstruction in 109 cases, bladder suspicious obstruction in 15 cases, no bladder obstruction in 6 cases. According to the classification of bladder function, 130 cases were divided into unstable bladder in 6 cases, low compliance bladder in 7 cases, bladder atony in 15 cases, bladder without tension in 3 cases, normal bladder function in 99 cases. 3 cases without bladder tension, including BOO in 2 cases, suspected BOO in 1 case, were accepted the cystostomy. 15 cases with less detrusor contraction, including BOO in 4 cases, suspected BOO in 9 cases, were accepted the cystostomy and TURP. Conservative treatment was performed in other 2 cases without obstruction. In 6 cases with unstable bladder, 2 cases without obstruction accepted the conservative treatment, 4 cases with suspected BOO accepted the TURP. In 7 patients with low compliance bladder, 2 cases without obstruction accepted the conservative treatment, 5 cases with suspected BOO accepted the TURP. The duration of following up was 3-6 months. The symptoms of the patients in this group improved significantly during following up. Conclusion For patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia complicated with bladder dysfunction, the results of urodynamics can help to choose the right treatment and improve effect of treatment. Key words: Urodynamic; Transurethral resection of prostate; Bladder dysfunction

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate the value of urodynamic in treating those patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia complicated with bladder dysfunction. Methods 130 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia were retrospectively reviewed between December 2015 and December 2016. The exclusive criteria included nervous system diseases, moderate to severe diabetes, moderate to severe hypertension, urethral stricture, bladder stones, prostate cancer, etc. The patient's age is ranged 51 to 92, mean 72 years old. The previous history of disease ranged from 3 months to 15 years, mean 4 years. All patients accepted the urodynamic examination. Different treatments were considered according to urodynamic studies. Results According to the classification of bladder outlet obstruction, 130 cases were classified as bladder outlet obstruction in 109 cases, bladder suspicious obstruction in 15 cases, no bladder obstruction in 6 cases. According to the classification of bladder function, 130 cases were divided into unstable bladder in 6 cases, low compliance bladder in 7 cases, bladder atony in 15 cases, bladder without tension in 3 cases, normal bladder function in 99 cases. 3 cases without bladder tension, including BOO in 2 cases, suspected BOO in 1 case, were accepted the cystostomy. 15 cases with less detrusor contraction, including BOO in 4 cases, suspected BOO in 9 cases, were accepted the cystostomy and TURP. Conservative treatment was performed in other 2 cases without obstruction. In 6 cases with unstable bladder, 2 cases without obstruction accepted the conservative treatment, 4 cases with suspected BOO accepted the TURP. In 7 patients with low compliance bladder, 2 cases without obstruction accepted the conservative treatment, 5 cases with suspected BOO accepted the TURP. The duration of following up was 3-6 months. The symptoms of the patients in this group improved significantly during following up. Conclusion For patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia complicated with bladder dysfunction, the results of urodynamics can help to choose the right treatment and improve effect of treatment. Key words: Urodynamic; Transurethral resection of prostate; Bladder dysfunction

Key concepts: Medicine, Bladder outlet obstruction, Hyperplasia, Urology, Cystostomy, Urinary bladder neck obstruction, Surgery, Prostate

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The value of urodynamic examination in treating the patient with prostatic hyperplasia accompany with dysfunction of the bladder — Research Paper | ScholarLens