2017•Int J ImmunolRequires access

The application value of serum pepsinogen and CA724 detection for the differential diagnosis of gastric cancer

Yuhong Xu, Yanli Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objectives To investigate clinical survey feasibility of pepsinogen ( PG) and CA724 as markers in the differential diagnosis of gastric cancer. Methods Enrolled patients were divided into three groups: gastric cancer 195 cases, chronic atrophic gastritis ( CAG) group 175 cases, normal control group 210 cases, according to the fibre gastroscopy and pathological cytology diagnosis.Pepsinogen Ⅰ( PG Ⅰ) and pepsinogen Ⅱ (PG Ⅱ) level were detected by immunoassay, then calculate the PGR( PG Ⅰ/PG Ⅱ) .Using electrochemi-luminescence immunoassay to qualitatively CA724 level. Results The gastric cancer group PGⅠ and PGR levels were significantly decreased than normal control group, with significant differences between the two groups (P=0.000); the content change of PG Ⅱ is little, no significant differences between the two groups (P=0.490) ; The CAG group PG Ⅰ and PGR levels were significantly lower than the normal control group, with significant differences between the two groups (P=0.003); the content change of PG Ⅱ is little, no significant differences between the two groups (P=0.407). PGR and PGⅠ had no statistical significance in gastric cancer group and CAG group (P=0.400) .CA724 levels in gastric cancer group was significantly higher than that of CAG group and the normal control group, the difference was statistically significant(P=0.003 ); but it had no significant differences in normal control group and CAG group (P=0.388). The PG sensitivity was 71.79%, specificity was 66.23% for diagnosis of gastric cancer, and the CA724 sensitivity was 41.28%, specificity was 92.2%.When combined PG and CA724 detection, the sensitivity was 82.67% and specificity was 73.59%.If both of the two detection were negative 82.78% exclude gastric cancer diagnosis. Conclusions If combined detection of the serum PG and CA724 are both negative, 82.78% gastric cancer can be discharged.It is feasible, as markers for gastric cancer differential diagnosis. Key words: Pepsinogen; Sugar antigen CA724; Gastric cancer; Chronic atrophic gastritis

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objectives To investigate clinical survey feasibility of pepsinogen ( PG) and CA724 as markers in the differential diagnosis of gastric cancer. Methods Enrolled patients were divided into three groups: gastric cancer 195 cases, chronic atrophic gastritis ( CAG) group 175 cases, normal control group 210 cases, according to the fibre gastroscopy and pathological cytology diagnosis.Pepsinogen Ⅰ( PG Ⅰ) and pepsinogen Ⅱ (PG Ⅱ) level were detected by immunoassay, then calculate the PGR( PG Ⅰ/PG Ⅱ) .Using electrochemi-luminescence immunoassay to qualitatively CA724 level. Results The gastric cancer group PGⅠ and PGR levels were significantly decreased than normal control group, with significant differences between the two groups (P=0.000); the content change of PG Ⅱ is little, no significant differences between the two groups (P=0.490) ; The CAG group PG Ⅰ and PGR levels were significantly lower than the normal control group, with significant differences between the two groups (P=0.003); the content change of PG Ⅱ is little, no significant differences between the two groups (P=0.407). PGR and PGⅠ had no statistical significance in gastric cancer group and CAG group (P=0.400) .CA724 levels in gastric cancer group was significantly higher than that of CAG group and the normal control group, the difference was statistically significant(P=0.003 ); but it had no significant differences in normal control group and CAG group (P=0.388). The PG sensitivity was 71.79%, specificity was 66.23% for diagnosis of gastric cancer, and the CA724 sensitivity was 41.28%, specificity was 92.2%.When combined PG and CA724 detection, the sensitivity was 82.67% and specificity was 73.59%.If both of the two detection were negative 82.78% exclude gastric cancer diagnosis. Conclusions If combined detection of the serum PG and CA724 are both negative, 82.78% gastric cancer can be discharged.It is feasible, as markers for gastric cancer differential diagnosis. Key words: Pepsinogen; Sugar antigen CA724; Gastric cancer; Chronic atrophic gastritis

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objectives To investigate clinical survey feasibility of pepsinogen ( PG) and CA724 as markers in the differential diagnosis of gastric cancer. Methods Enrolled patients were divided into three groups: gastric cancer 195 cases, chronic atrophic gastritis ( CAG) group 175 cases, normal control group 210 cases, according to the fibre gastroscopy and pathological cytology diagnosis.Pepsinogen Ⅰ( PG Ⅰ) and pepsinogen Ⅱ (PG Ⅱ) level were detected by immunoassay, then calculate the PGR( PG Ⅰ/PG Ⅱ) .Using electrochemi-luminescence immunoassay to qualitatively CA724 level. Results The gastric cancer group PGⅠ and PGR levels were significantly decreased than normal control group, with significant differences between the two groups (P=0.000); the content change of PG Ⅱ is little, no significant differences between the two groups (P=0.490) ; The CAG group PG Ⅰ and PGR levels were significantly lower than the normal control group, with significant differences between the two groups (P=0.003); the content change of PG Ⅱ is little, no significant differences between the two groups (P=0.407). PGR and PGⅠ had no statistical significance in gastric cancer group and CAG group (P=0.400) .CA724 levels in gastric cancer group was significantly higher than that of CAG group and the normal control group, the difference was statistically significant(P=0.003 ); but it had no significant differences in normal control group and CAG group (P=0.388). The PG sensitivity was 71.79%, specificity was 66.23% for diagnosis of gastric cancer, and the CA724 sensitivity was 41.28%, specificity was 92.2%.When combined PG and CA724 detection, the sensitivity was 82.67% and specificity was 73.59%.If both of the two detection were negative 82.78% exclude gastric cancer diagnosis. Conclusions If combined detection of the serum PG and CA724 are both negative, 82.78% gastric cancer can be discharged.It is feasible, as markers for gastric cancer differential diagnosis. Key words: Pepsinogen; Sugar antigen CA724; Gastric cancer; Chronic atrophic gastritis

Key concepts: Internal medicine, Gastroenterology, Pathological, Atrophic gastritis, Cancer, Pepsin, Medicine, Pathology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The application value of serum pepsinogen and CA724 detection for the differential diagnosis of gastric cancer — Research Paper | ScholarLens