Conflict Management Styles Used by Members of the Kansas Highway Patrol to Handle Conflict Situations
Lonnie Whitten
Abstract
Lonnie Whitten
Abstract
The purpose of this thesis was to examine conflict management styles used by members of the Kansas Highway Patrol to handle conflict situations. Various aspects of conflict and conflict management were researched as well as the background of the Kansas Highway Patrol. The Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument was administered to 175 members of the Kansas Highway Patrol to determine styles of conflict handling methods used when dealing with conflict. Demographic classifications including age, rank, years of service, and education level were examined. Analysis of variance and t-tests were calculated to determine significant results. The results of the research revealed that the subjects could not be characterized as having a single, dominant style of conflict management. A mix of compromising, avoiding, and accommodating conflict management styles dominated within this group of respondents as styles used to handle conflict situations.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The purpose of this thesis was to examine conflict management styles used by members of the Kansas Highway Patrol to handle conflict situations. Various aspects of conflict and conflict management were researched as well as the background of the Kansas Highway Patrol. The Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument was administered to 175 members of the Kansas Highway Patrol to determine styles of conflict handling methods used when dealing with conflict. Demographic classifications including age, rank, years of service, and education level were examined. Analysis of variance and t-tests were calculated to determine significant results. The results of the research revealed that the subjects could not be characterized as having a single, dominant style of conflict management. A mix of compromising, avoiding, and accommodating conflict management styles dominated within this group of respondents as styles used to handle conflict situations.
Key concepts: Conflict management, Conflict resolution, Psychology, Variance (accounting), Style (visual arts), Management styles, Applied psychology, Social psychology