2015Zhonghua shenjing waike zazhiRequires access

Lumbar continuous drainage of cerebrospinal fluid for the efficacy of patients with spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage: a meta-analysis

Ri Li, Wenchen Li, Zhijun Lun

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the treatment effect of lumbar continuous drainage of cerebrospinal fluid for spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage. Methods Pubmed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, CBM, Wangfang, and VIP dadabase were retrieved with computers, and the cut-off time was March 2015. The related control studies were searched. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total of 20 studies and 2739 patients were enrolled. The results of meta-analysis showed that continuous lumbar cistern drainage of cerebrospinal fluid was superior to the routine therapy in the following aspects: the mortality during hospitalization (OR, 0.36; 95% CI 0.25-0.51; P<0.001), incidence of rebleeding (OR, 0.49; 95% CI 0.30-0.79; P<0.05), vasospasm (OR, 0.19; 95% CI 0.14-0.24; P<0.001), hydrocephalus (OR, 0.35; 95% CI 0.28-0.45; P<0.001), delayed ischemic neurological deficit (OR, 0.44; 95% CI 0.31-0.63; P<0.001), duration of headache in patients [WMD, -9.15; 95% CI -9.92, -8.39, P<0.001], and GOS scale score (WMD, 0.69; 95% CI 0.53-0.86; P<0.001). Conclusions Compared with the conventional treatment, the continuous lumbar cistern drainage of cerebrospinal fluid may decrease the mortality, incidence of rebleeding, vasospasm, hydrocephalus, and the occurrence of delayed ischemic neurological deficit in patients. At the same time, the headache duration of the patients can be decrease significantly and the GOS scores can be increased significantly. Key words: Cerebrospinal fluid; Drainage; Subarachnoid hemorrhage; Meta-analysis

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the treatment effect of lumbar continuous drainage of cerebrospinal fluid for spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage. Methods Pubmed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, CBM, Wangfang, and VIP dadabase were retrieved with computers, and the cut-off time was March 2015. The related control studies were searched. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total of 20 studies and 2739 patients were enrolled. The results of meta-analysis showed that continuous lumbar cistern drainage of cerebrospinal fluid was superior to the routine therapy in the following aspects: the mortality during hospitalization (OR, 0.36; 95% CI 0.25-0.51; P<0.001), incidence of rebleeding (OR, 0.49; 95% CI 0.30-0.79; P<0.05), vasospasm (OR, 0.19; 95% CI 0.14-0.24; P<0.001), hydrocephalus (OR, 0.35; 95% CI 0.28-0.45; P<0.001), delayed ischemic neurological deficit (OR, 0.44; 95% CI 0.31-0.63; P<0.001), duration of headache in patients [WMD, -9.15; 95% CI -9.92, -8.39, P<0.001], and GOS scale score (WMD, 0.69; 95% CI 0.53-0.86; P<0.001). Conclusions Compared with the conventional treatment, the continuous lumbar cistern drainage of cerebrospinal fluid may decrease the mortality, incidence of rebleeding, vasospasm, hydrocephalus, and the occurrence of delayed ischemic neurological deficit in patients. At the same time, the headache duration of the patients can be decrease significantly and the GOS scores can be increased significantly. Key words: Cerebrospinal fluid; Drainage; Subarachnoid hemorrhage; Meta-analysis

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the treatment effect of lumbar continuous drainage of cerebrospinal fluid for spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage. Methods Pubmed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, CBM, Wangfang, and VIP dadabase were retrieved with computers, and the cut-off time was March 2015. The related control studies were searched. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total of 20 studies and 2739 patients were enrolled. The results of meta-analysis showed that continuous lumbar cistern drainage of cerebrospinal fluid was superior to the routine therapy in the following aspects: the mortality during hospitalization (OR, 0.36; 95% CI 0.25-0.51; P<0.001), incidence of rebleeding (OR, 0.49; 95% CI 0.30-0.79; P<0.05), vasospasm (OR, 0.19; 95% CI 0.14-0.24; P<0.001), hydrocephalus (OR, 0.35; 95% CI 0.28-0.45; P<0.001), delayed ischemic neurological deficit (OR, 0.44; 95% CI 0.31-0.63; P<0.001), duration of headache in patients [WMD, -9.15; 95% CI -9.92, -8.39, P<0.001], and GOS scale score (WMD, 0.69; 95% CI 0.53-0.86; P<0.001). Conclusions Compared with the conventional treatment, the continuous lumbar cistern drainage of cerebrospinal fluid may decrease the mortality, incidence of rebleeding, vasospasm, hydrocephalus, and the occurrence of delayed ischemic neurological deficit in patients. At the same time, the headache duration of the patients can be decrease significantly and the GOS scores can be increased significantly. Key words: Cerebrospinal fluid; Drainage; Subarachnoid hemorrhage; Meta-analysis

Key concepts: Medicine, Cerebrospinal fluid, Cochrane Library, Subarachnoid hemorrhage, Hydrocephalus, Incidence (geometry), Lumbar, Lumbar puncture

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Lumbar continuous drainage of cerebrospinal fluid for the efficacy of patients with spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage: a meta-analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens