2009Zhongguo xunzheng yixue zazhiRequires access

Lumbar Continuous Drainage of the Cerebrospinal Fluid Therapy for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage:A Systematic Review

Wei Dong

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objectives To assess the effectiveness and safety of lumbar continuous drainage of the cerebrospinal fluid therapy for subarachnoid hemorrhage(SAH).Methods The method of Cochrane systematic review was used to evaluate the randomized controlled trials(RCTs)of lumbar contiunous drainage of the cerebrospinal fluid therapy for SAH.Results We included 7 RCTs involving 390 patients.The methodological quality of all the trials was poor.The poor outcome and adverse event evaluation of the SAH patients at the end of long-term follow-up(at least three months)were not reported in all studies.Meta-analysis of fatality showed a better effect of lumbar continuous drainage of the cerebrospinal fluid therapy for SAH than the control group with statistical significance [RR=0.32,95%CI(0.15,0.70)].Meta-analysis of complications also showed a better effect of lumbar continuous drainage of the cerebrospinal fluid therapy for SAH than the control group with statistical significance(except re-bleeding)[cerebral vasospasm RR=0.15,95%CI(0.06,0.33),hydrocephalus RR=0.22,95%CI(0.10,0.52),cerebral infarction RR=0.25,95%CI(0.08,0.82)].Only one trial reported the adverse events of lumbar continuous drainage of the cerebrospinal fluid therapy including intracranial infection and intracranial hypotension reaction,while the other trials did not report the adverse events.Conclusion With poor quality of the most included trials,insufficient evidence is obtained to support the conclusion that lumbar continuous drainage of the cerebrospinal fluid therapy is safe and effective in the treatment of SAH.Further high-quality RCTs should be carried out to provide more reliable evidence.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objectives To assess the effectiveness and safety of lumbar continuous drainage of the cerebrospinal fluid therapy for subarachnoid hemorrhage(SAH).Methods The method of Cochrane systematic review was used to evaluate the randomized controlled trials(RCTs)of lumbar contiunous drainage of the cerebrospinal fluid therapy for SAH.Results We included 7 RCTs involving 390 patients.The methodological quality of all the trials was poor.The poor outcome and adverse event evaluation of the SAH patients at the end of long-term follow-up(at least three months)were not reported in all studies.Meta-analysis of fatality showed a better effect of lumbar continuous drainage of the cerebrospinal fluid therapy for SAH than the control group with statistical significance [RR=0.32,95%CI(0.15,0.70)].Meta-analysis of complications also showed a better effect of lumbar continuous drainage of the cerebrospinal fluid therapy for SAH than the control group with statistical significance(except re-bleeding)[cerebral vasospasm RR=0.15,95%CI(0.06,0.33),hydrocephalus RR=0.22,95%CI(0.10,0.52),cerebral infarction RR=0.25,95%CI(0.08,0.82)].Only one trial reported the adverse events of lumbar continuous drainage of the cerebrospinal fluid therapy including intracranial infection and intracranial hypotension reaction,while the other trials did not report the adverse events.Conclusion With poor quality of the most included trials,insufficient evidence is obtained to support the conclusion that lumbar continuous drainage of the cerebrospinal fluid therapy is safe and effective in the treatment of SAH.Further high-quality RCTs should be carried out to provide more reliable evidence.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objectives To assess the effectiveness and safety of lumbar continuous drainage of the cerebrospinal fluid therapy for subarachnoid hemorrhage(SAH).Methods The method of Cochrane systematic review was used to evaluate the randomized controlled trials(RCTs)of lumbar contiunous drainage of the cerebrospinal fluid therapy for SAH.Results We included 7 RCTs involving 390 patients.The methodological quality of all the trials was poor.The poor outcome and adverse event evaluation of the SAH patients at the end of long-term follow-up(at least three months)were not reported in all studies.Meta-analysis of fatality showed a better effect of lumbar continuous drainage of the cerebrospinal fluid therapy for SAH than the control group with statistical significance [RR=0.32,95%CI(0.15,0.70)].Meta-analysis of complications also showed a better effect of lumbar continuous drainage of the cerebrospinal fluid therapy for SAH than the control group with statistical significance(except re-bleeding)[cerebral vasospasm RR=0.15,95%CI(0.06,0.33),hydrocephalus RR=0.22,95%CI(0.10,0.52),cerebral infarction RR=0.25,95%CI(0.08,0.82)].Only one trial reported the adverse events of lumbar continuous drainage of the cerebrospinal fluid therapy including intracranial infection and intracranial hypotension reaction,while the other trials did not report the adverse events.Conclusion With poor quality of the most included trials,insufficient evidence is obtained to support the conclusion that lumbar continuous drainage of the cerebrospinal fluid therapy is safe and effective in the treatment of SAH.Further high-quality RCTs should be carried out to provide more reliable evidence.

Key concepts: Medicine, Cerebrospinal fluid, Subarachnoid hemorrhage, Adverse effect, Lumbar, Randomized controlled trial, Anesthesia, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Lumbar Continuous Drainage of the Cerebrospinal Fluid Therapy for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage:A Systematic Review — Research Paper | ScholarLens