2019•Zhongguo jiceng yiyaoRequires access

Effect of metoprolol in emergency treatment of chronic congestive heart failure

Liangping Chen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate the efficacy of metoprolol in the emergency treatment of chronic congestive heart failure. Methods From January 2016 to September 2018, 300 cases of chronic congestive heart failure with acute attack in Zhoushan Hospital were selected.According to random number table method, the patients were divided into two groups, with 150 cases in each group.The control group was given conventional heart failure treatment, the observation group received conventional heart failure therapy combined with metoprolol.The clinical efficacy, heart color ultrasound indicator, 6 minutes walking distance, NT-proBNP level, life quality score and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results (1)The total effective rate of the observation group was 96.00%(141/150), which was higher than 87.33%(131/150) of the control group (χ2=7.375, P<0.05). (2) After treatment, the LVEDD[(58.12±3.89)mm], LVESD[(44.39±6.17)mm], NT-proBNP[(378.32±27.82)ng/mL] in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (t=10.646, 9.966, 9.283, all P<0.05), the LVEF[(49.36±6.25)%], SV[(76.29±6.24)mL] in the observation group were higher than those in the control group(t=9.092, 8.739, all P<0.05). The 6-minute walking distance[(452.37±61.75)m] of the observation group was longer than that of the control group(t=7.717, P<0.05). The quality of life scores in the emotional field[(6.47±1.29)points], physical field[(10.46±1.65)points], other fields[(10.51±1.32)points]and comprehensive score[(27.44±4.26)points] of the observation group were lower than those of the control group(t=9.030, 9.024, 9.299, 9.114, all P<0.05). (3)During the treatment, no obvious adverse reactions occurred in the two groups. Conclusion In the emergency treatment of patients with chronic congestive heart failure, the application of conventional anti-heart failure treatment regimen metoprolol can effectively improve the patients' heart function, and is conductive to improving their clinical efficacy and quality of life, with fewer adverse drug reactions and good safety. Key words: Heart failure; Anti-heart failure therapy; Metoprolol; Cardiac function; Beta 1 beta blocker; Quality of life; Security; Clinical curative effect

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate the efficacy of metoprolol in the emergency treatment of chronic congestive heart failure. Methods From January 2016 to September 2018, 300 cases of chronic congestive heart failure with acute attack in Zhoushan Hospital were selected.According to random number table method, the patients were divided into two groups, with 150 cases in each group.The control group was given conventional heart failure treatment, the observation group received conventional heart failure therapy combined with metoprolol.The clinical efficacy, heart color ultrasound indicator, 6 minutes walking distance, NT-proBNP level, life quality score and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results (1)The total effective rate of the observation group was 96.00%(141/150), which was higher than 87.33%(131/150) of the control group (χ2=7.375, P<0.05). (2) After treatment, the LVEDD[(58.12±3.89)mm], LVESD[(44.39±6.17)mm], NT-proBNP[(378.32±27.82)ng/mL] in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (t=10.646, 9.966, 9.283, all P<0.05), the LVEF[(49.36±6.25)%], SV[(76.29±6.24)mL] in the observation group were higher than those in the control group(t=9.092, 8.739, all P<0.05). The 6-minute walking distance[(452.37±61.75)m] of the observation group was longer than that of the control group(t=7.717, P<0.05). The quality of life scores in the emotional field[(6.47±1.29)points], physical field[(10.46±1.65)points], other fields[(10.51±1.32)points]and comprehensive score[(27.44±4.26)points] of the observation group were lower than those of the control group(t=9.030, 9.024, 9.299, 9.114, all P<0.05). (3)During the treatment, no obvious adverse reactions occurred in the two groups. Conclusion In the emergency treatment of patients with chronic congestive heart failure, the application of conventional anti-heart failure treatment regimen metoprolol can effectively improve the patients' heart function, and is conductive to improving their clinical efficacy and quality of life, with fewer adverse drug reactions and good safety. Key words: Heart failure; Anti-heart failure therapy; Metoprolol; Cardiac function; Beta 1 beta blocker; Quality of life; Security; Clinical curative effect

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate the efficacy of metoprolol in the emergency treatment of chronic congestive heart failure. Methods From January 2016 to September 2018, 300 cases of chronic congestive heart failure with acute attack in Zhoushan Hospital were selected.According to random number table method, the patients were divided into two groups, with 150 cases in each group.The control group was given conventional heart failure treatment, the observation group received conventional heart failure therapy combined with metoprolol.The clinical efficacy, heart color ultrasound indicator, 6 minutes walking distance, NT-proBNP level, life quality score and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results (1)The total effective rate of the observation group was 96.00%(141/150), which was higher than 87.33%(131/150) of the control group (χ2=7.375, P<0.05). (2) After treatment, the LVEDD[(58.12±3.89)mm], LVESD[(44.39±6.17)mm], NT-proBNP[(378.32±27.82)ng/mL] in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (t=10.646, 9.966, 9.283, all P<0.05), the LVEF[(49.36±6.25)%], SV[(76.29±6.24)mL] in the observation group were higher than those in the control group(t=9.092, 8.739, all P<0.05). The 6-minute walking distance[(452.37±61.75)m] of the observation group was longer than that of the control group(t=7.717, P<0.05). The quality of life scores in the emotional field[(6.47±1.29)points], physical field[(10.46±1.65)points], other fields[(10.51±1.32)points]and comprehensive score[(27.44±4.26)points] of the observation group were lower than those of the control group(t=9.030, 9.024, 9.299, 9.114, all P<0.05). (3)During the treatment, no obvious adverse reactions occurred in the two groups. Conclusion In the emergency treatment of patients with chronic congestive heart failure, the application of conventional anti-heart failure treatment regimen metoprolol can effectively improve the patients' heart function, and is conductive to improving their clinical efficacy and quality of life, with fewer adverse drug reactions and good safety. Key words: Heart failure; Anti-heart failure therapy; Metoprolol; Cardiac function; Beta 1 beta blocker; Quality of life; Security; Clinical curative effect

Key concepts: Medicine, Metoprolol, Heart failure, Ejection fraction, Internal medicine, Cardiology, Heart rate, Quality of life (healthcare)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of metoprolol in emergency treatment of chronic congestive heart failure — Research Paper | ScholarLens