2020国际医药卫生导报Requires access

Curative efficacy of immediate dental implant and conventional dental implant in the treatment of patients with tooth loss

Yipu Xie, Linjun Wang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To study the curative effect of immediate dental implant and conventional dental implant in the treatment of patients with tooth loss. Methods 120 patients with tooth loss treated in our hospital from January 2017 to January 2019 were selected as the study subjects. By the random number table method, the patients were divided into observation group (n=60) and control group (n=60). The control group was treated with conventional dental implant, while the observation group was treated with immediate dental implant. Clinical outcomes, ISQ and PES scores, quality of life score, treatment duration, satisfaction, and complications were compared between the two groups after treatment. Results After treatment, the success rate of operation in the observation group (96.67%) was significantly higher than that in the control group (85.00%), with statistically significant difference (P<0.05). The ISQ value and PES score of the two groups at 3, 6 months after treatment were all higher than those at 1 month after treatment (P<0.05); ISQ value and PES score of the observation group were higher than those of the control group at 1, 3, 6 months after treatment (P<0.05). After treatment, the quality of life score in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group [(96.68±3.58) vs.(84.15±3.97)], with statistically significant difference (P<0.05). After treatment, treatment time and satisfaction score [(128.37±21.75)d, (94.56±2.83) points] in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group [(151.48±38.95) d, (87.46±5.77) points], with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). After treatment, the incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group (3.33%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (15.00%), with statistically significant difference (P<0.05). Conclusion For patients with tooth loss, immediate dental implantation is more effective, more stable and beautiful, which can shorten the treatment time and reduce the pain of patients, which is worthy of promotion. Key words: Missing teeth; Immediate dental implant; Conventional dental implant; Curative effect; Implant stability; Aesthetic repair

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To study the curative effect of immediate dental implant and conventional dental implant in the treatment of patients with tooth loss. Methods 120 patients with tooth loss treated in our hospital from January 2017 to January 2019 were selected as the study subjects. By the random number table method, the patients were divided into observation group (n=60) and control group (n=60). The control group was treated with conventional dental implant, while the observation group was treated with immediate dental implant. Clinical outcomes, ISQ and PES scores, quality of life score, treatment duration, satisfaction, and complications were compared between the two groups after treatment. Results After treatment, the success rate of operation in the observation group (96.67%) was significantly higher than that in the control group (85.00%), with statistically significant difference (P<0.05). The ISQ value and PES score of the two groups at 3, 6 months after treatment were all higher than those at 1 month after treatment (P<0.05); ISQ value and PES score of the observation group were higher than those of the control group at 1, 3, 6 months after treatment (P<0.05). After treatment, the quality of life score in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group [(96.68±3.58) vs.(84.15±3.97)], with statistically significant difference (P<0.05). After treatment, treatment time and satisfaction score [(128.37±21.75)d, (94.56±2.83) points] in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group [(151.48±38.95) d, (87.46±5.77) points], with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). After treatment, the incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group (3.33%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (15.00%), with statistically significant difference (P<0.05). Conclusion For patients with tooth loss, immediate dental implantation is more effective, more stable and beautiful, which can shorten the treatment time and reduce the pain of patients, which is worthy of promotion. Key words: Missing teeth; Immediate dental implant; Conventional dental implant; Curative effect; Implant stability; Aesthetic repair

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To study the curative effect of immediate dental implant and conventional dental implant in the treatment of patients with tooth loss. Methods 120 patients with tooth loss treated in our hospital from January 2017 to January 2019 were selected as the study subjects. By the random number table method, the patients were divided into observation group (n=60) and control group (n=60). The control group was treated with conventional dental implant, while the observation group was treated with immediate dental implant. Clinical outcomes, ISQ and PES scores, quality of life score, treatment duration, satisfaction, and complications were compared between the two groups after treatment. Results After treatment, the success rate of operation in the observation group (96.67%) was significantly higher than that in the control group (85.00%), with statistically significant difference (P<0.05). The ISQ value and PES score of the two groups at 3, 6 months after treatment were all higher than those at 1 month after treatment (P<0.05); ISQ value and PES score of the observation group were higher than those of the control group at 1, 3, 6 months after treatment (P<0.05). After treatment, the quality of life score in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group [(96.68±3.58) vs.(84.15±3.97)], with statistically significant difference (P<0.05). After treatment, treatment time and satisfaction score [(128.37±21.75)d, (94.56±2.83) points] in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group [(151.48±38.95) d, (87.46±5.77) points], with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). After treatment, the incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group (3.33%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (15.00%), with statistically significant difference (P<0.05). Conclusion For patients with tooth loss, immediate dental implantation is more effective, more stable and beautiful, which can shorten the treatment time and reduce the pain of patients, which is worthy of promotion. Key words: Missing teeth; Immediate dental implant; Conventional dental implant; Curative effect; Implant stability; Aesthetic repair

Key concepts: Medicine, Implant, Dentistry, Dental implant, Quality of life (healthcare), Treatment and control groups, Patient satisfaction, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Curative efficacy of immediate dental implant and conventional dental implant in the treatment of patients with tooth loss — Research Paper | ScholarLens