2012Guoji yiyao weisheng daobaoRequires access

Clinical comparison on restoring posterior teeth with composite resin fillings and indirect resin inlays

Xi-chao Hong, Jing Wen, Shide Yu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the clinical performance of resin fillings and inlays in restoring the posterior teeth.Methods 46 posterior teeth were filled with composite resin directly and 50 posterior teeth were restored with indirect resin inlays.Each restoration was evaluated at baseline,after 1 year and 2 years,according to the modified USPHS criteria.Results There was significant difference in marginal discoloration,marginal integrity,secondary carries and wear-resistance between these two groups (P<0.05).The achievement ratio of direct resin fillings was 72.2% and the achievement ratio of indirect resin inlays was 91.3% Conclusion Indirect resin inlays can be suitable for restorations of posterior teeth with more physical property,with less irritation or microleakage. Key words: Composite resin; Inlay; Posterior teeth

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the clinical performance of resin fillings and inlays in restoring the posterior teeth.Methods 46 posterior teeth were filled with composite resin directly and 50 posterior teeth were restored with indirect resin inlays.Each restoration was evaluated at baseline,after 1 year and 2 years,according to the modified USPHS criteria.Results There was significant difference in marginal discoloration,marginal integrity,secondary carries and wear-resistance between these two groups (P<0.05).The achievement ratio of direct resin fillings was 72.2% and the achievement ratio of indirect resin inlays was 91.3% Conclusion Indirect resin inlays can be suitable for restorations of posterior teeth with more physical property,with less irritation or microleakage. Key words: Composite resin; Inlay; Posterior teeth

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the clinical performance of resin fillings and inlays in restoring the posterior teeth.Methods 46 posterior teeth were filled with composite resin directly and 50 posterior teeth were restored with indirect resin inlays.Each restoration was evaluated at baseline,after 1 year and 2 years,according to the modified USPHS criteria.Results There was significant difference in marginal discoloration,marginal integrity,secondary carries and wear-resistance between these two groups (P<0.05).The achievement ratio of direct resin fillings was 72.2% and the achievement ratio of indirect resin inlays was 91.3% Conclusion Indirect resin inlays can be suitable for restorations of posterior teeth with more physical property,with less irritation or microleakage. Key words: Composite resin; Inlay; Posterior teeth

Key concepts: Inlay, Posterior teeth, Dentistry, Resin composite, Significant difference, Composite number, Orthodontics, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical comparison on restoring posterior teeth with composite resin fillings and indirect resin inlays — Research Paper | ScholarLens