2012•中国综合临床Requires access

Effects of different anesthesia methods on hemodynamics and the quality of palinesthesia in elderly patients during peroperative period

Hongyue Wang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To explore two different anesthesia methods on hemodynamics and the quality of palinesthesia in elderly patients during peroperative period.Methods Sixty elderly patients with Hip Replacement( ASA,Ⅰ,Ⅱ ) were randomly divided into general anesthesia group ( group A,n =30 ) and combined general and epidural anesthesia group( group B,n =30).The changes of mean arterial pressure(MAP)and heart rate( HR ) were monitored before induction of anesthesia( T1 ),at intubation( T2 ),during skin incision (T3) and at the time of extubation ( T4 ),at 30 min after extubation ( T5 ) and at the same time,the dosage of general anesthetics and each index's time after operation to awake were recorded of the patients in both groups.Results The MAP and HR of patients in two groups at T2,T3,T4,T5 were all increased when compared with T1.And the increasing degree of MAP and HR in group A were higher than that in group B ( MAP:within group F =17.352,interaction F =4.326,between groups F =8.652; HR:within group F =11.561,interaction F =5.241 between groups F =7.248; P < 0.05 ).The dosage of general anesthetics was significantly different between two groups[ sevoflurane:(1.40 ± 0.30)MAC vs (1.00 ± 0.12 )MAC,t =0.37,P<0.05 ; fentanyl:(0.34 ±0.08)mg vs(0.18 ±0.03) mg,t =0.21,P <0.05 ; vecuronium:(6.20 ±0.32) mg vs(4.10 ±0.31 ) mg,t =1.24,P <0.05 ; propofol:(448 ±24) mg vs(393 ±26) mg,t =3.46,P <0.05].There was significant difference on gag reflex time [ ( 18.00 ± 1.27 ) min vs ( 12.31 ± 2.54 ) min,t =2.74,P < 0.05 ],time to extubation [ ( 24.03 ± 2.42 ) min vs ( 16.05 ± 1.20 ) min,t =3.68,P < 0.05 ],fully awake time [(29.54±5.24)min vs(19.25±2.64)min,t=1.35,P<0.05] between these two groups.Conclusion The two different anesthesia methods can ensure haemodynamic stability of elderly patients undergoing hip replacement during peroperative period.But compared with general anesthesia group,combined general and epidural anesthesia group can reduce the dosage of general anesthetics and shorten the time of extubation significantly,it is a viable and an ideal method. Key words: General anesthesia; Epidural blockade; Hemodynamic; Palinesthesia

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To explore two different anesthesia methods on hemodynamics and the quality of palinesthesia in elderly patients during peroperative period.Methods Sixty elderly patients with Hip Replacement( ASA,Ⅰ,Ⅱ ) were randomly divided into general anesthesia group ( group A,n =30 ) and combined general and epidural anesthesia group( group B,n =30).The changes of mean arterial pressure(MAP)and heart rate( HR ) were monitored before induction of anesthesia( T1 ),at intubation( T2 ),during skin incision (T3) and at the time of extubation ( T4 ),at 30 min after extubation ( T5 ) and at the same time,the dosage of general anesthetics and each index's time after operation to awake were recorded of the patients in both groups.Results The MAP and HR of patients in two groups at T2,T3,T4,T5 were all increased when compared with T1.And the increasing degree of MAP and HR in group A were higher than that in group B ( MAP:within group F =17.352,interaction F =4.326,between groups F =8.652; HR:within group F =11.561,interaction F =5.241 between groups F =7.248; P < 0.05 ).The dosage of general anesthetics was significantly different between two groups[ sevoflurane:(1.40 ± 0.30)MAC vs (1.00 ± 0.12 )MAC,t =0.37,P<0.05 ; fentanyl:(0.34 ±0.08)mg vs(0.18 ±0.03) mg,t =0.21,P <0.05 ; vecuronium:(6.20 ±0.32) mg vs(4.10 ±0.31 ) mg,t =1.24,P <0.05 ; propofol:(448 ±24) mg vs(393 ±26) mg,t =3.46,P <0.05].There was significant difference on gag reflex time [ ( 18.00 ± 1.27 ) min vs ( 12.31 ± 2.54 ) min,t =2.74,P < 0.05 ],time to extubation [ ( 24.03 ± 2.42 ) min vs ( 16.05 ± 1.20 ) min,t =3.68,P < 0.05 ],fully awake time [(29.54±5.24)min vs(19.25±2.64)min,t=1.35,P<0.05] between these two groups.Conclusion The two different anesthesia methods can ensure haemodynamic stability of elderly patients undergoing hip replacement during peroperative period.But compared with general anesthesia group,combined general and epidural anesthesia group can reduce the dosage of general anesthetics and shorten the time of extubation significantly,it is a viable and an ideal method. Key words: General anesthesia; Epidural blockade; Hemodynamic; Palinesthesia

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To explore two different anesthesia methods on hemodynamics and the quality of palinesthesia in elderly patients during peroperative period.Methods Sixty elderly patients with Hip Replacement( ASA,Ⅰ,Ⅱ ) were randomly divided into general anesthesia group ( group A,n =30 ) and combined general and epidural anesthesia group( group B,n =30).The changes of mean arterial pressure(MAP)and heart rate( HR ) were monitored before induction of anesthesia( T1 ),at intubation( T2 ),during skin incision (T3) and at the time of extubation ( T4 ),at 30 min after extubation ( T5 ) and at the same time,the dosage of general anesthetics and each index's time after operation to awake were recorded of the patients in both groups.Results The MAP and HR of patients in two groups at T2,T3,T4,T5 were all increased when compared with T1.And the increasing degree of MAP and HR in group A were higher than that in group B ( MAP:within group F =17.352,interaction F =4.326,between groups F =8.652; HR:within group F =11.561,interaction F =5.241 between groups F =7.248; P < 0.05 ).The dosage of general anesthetics was significantly different between two groups[ sevoflurane:(1.40 ± 0.30)MAC vs (1.00 ± 0.12 )MAC,t =0.37,P<0.05 ; fentanyl:(0.34 ±0.08)mg vs(0.18 ±0.03) mg,t =0.21,P <0.05 ; vecuronium:(6.20 ±0.32) mg vs(4.10 ±0.31 ) mg,t =1.24,P <0.05 ; propofol:(448 ±24) mg vs(393 ±26) mg,t =3.46,P <0.05].There was significant difference on gag reflex time [ ( 18.00 ± 1.27 ) min vs ( 12.31 ± 2.54 ) min,t =2.74,P < 0.05 ],time to extubation [ ( 24.03 ± 2.42 ) min vs ( 16.05 ± 1.20 ) min,t =3.68,P < 0.05 ],fully awake time [(29.54±5.24)min vs(19.25±2.64)min,t=1.35,P<0.05] between these two groups.Conclusion The two different anesthesia methods can ensure haemodynamic stability of elderly patients undergoing hip replacement during peroperative period.But compared with general anesthesia group,combined general and epidural anesthesia group can reduce the dosage of general anesthetics and shorten the time of extubation significantly,it is a viable and an ideal method. Key words: General anesthesia; Epidural blockade; Hemodynamic; Palinesthesia

Key concepts: Medicine, Anesthesia, Fentanyl, Propofol, Hemodynamics, Sevoflurane, Intubation, Heart rate

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effects of different anesthesia methods on hemodynamics and the quality of palinesthesia in elderly patients during peroperative period — Research Paper | ScholarLens