2019Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

Cinematic Education, Cinematic Sovereignty

Golbarg Rekabtalaei

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Chapter 1 touched upon the importance that Iranian cosmopolitans in the 1910s and early 1920s attached to cinema as a medium for the moral edification of the public in the service of national advancement, despite the absence of a centralised cinema institution. The praising of cinema’s didactic potential in the education of children and enlightenment of society, as indicated in newspaper articles and film announcements from the late 1920s to mid-1930s, attests to a more formal approval of cinema as a pedagogical medium in this era. Just as print had transferred singular authority of individuals to texts, in the absence of a state-sponsored cinema institution, the authority of individuals was transferred to heterogeneous cinema in the early twentieth century, thus occasioning democratic imaginings in late Qajar Iran (also manifested in the Constitutional Revolution and social movements of this era). As this chapter will demonstrate, with the coming of the Pahlavi Dynasty (1925–1979) and the solidification of an ideological nationalism, cinema was taken over by statist nationalism and became increasingly regulated and controlled by the state.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Chapter 1 touched upon the importance that Iranian cosmopolitans in the 1910s and early 1920s attached to cinema as a medium for the moral edification of the public in the service of national advancement, despite the absence of a centralised cinema institution. The praising of cinema’s didactic potential in the education of children and enlightenment of society, as indicated in newspaper articles and film announcements from the late 1920s to mid-1930s, attests to a more formal approval of cinema as a pedagogical medium in this era. Just as print had transferred singular authority of individuals to texts, in the absence of a state-sponsored cinema institution, the authority of individuals was transferred to heterogeneous cinema in the early twentieth century, thus occasioning democratic imaginings in late Qajar Iran (also manifested in the Constitutional Revolution and social movements of this era). As this chapter will demonstrate, with the coming of the Pahlavi Dynasty (1925–1979) and the solidification of an ideological nationalism, cinema was taken over by statist nationalism and became increasingly regulated and controlled by the state.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Chapter 1 touched upon the importance that Iranian cosmopolitans in the 1910s and early 1920s attached to cinema as a medium for the moral edification of the public in the service of national advancement, despite the absence of a centralised cinema institution. The praising of cinema’s didactic potential in the education of children and enlightenment of society, as indicated in newspaper articles and film announcements from the late 1920s to mid-1930s, attests to a more formal approval of cinema as a pedagogical medium in this era. Just as print had transferred singular authority of individuals to texts, in the absence of a state-sponsored cinema institution, the authority of individuals was transferred to heterogeneous cinema in the early twentieth century, thus occasioning democratic imaginings in late Qajar Iran (also manifested in the Constitutional Revolution and social movements of this era). As this chapter will demonstrate, with the coming of the Pahlavi Dynasty (1925–1979) and the solidification of an ideological nationalism, cinema was taken over by statist nationalism and became increasingly regulated and controlled by the state.

Key concepts: Movie theater, Ideology, Nationalism, Enlightenment, Institution, State (computer science), Sovereignty, Media studies

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cinematic Education, Cinematic Sovereignty — Research Paper | ScholarLens