2020•Unpublished venueRequires access

Public Diplomacy Evaluation

Robert P. Banks

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

This chapter explores the benefits and challenges of public diplomacy, notably identifying an effective assessment regime. What is effective can be structural, financial, cultural, administrative, conceptual, or all of the above. The chapter outlines the intangible hurdles, short-term orientation of programs that manifest over time, frequent changes in leadership, etc., and argues that key to effective campaigns is whether or not the recommendations are acted upon. The author concludes that, in the end, public diplomacy evaluation is neither magic bullet nor rabbit hole. It is a process that encourages institutional reflection, a tool that promotes learning, an exercise in soft discipline for staff, and a means to ensure accountability.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter explores the benefits and challenges of public diplomacy, notably identifying an effective assessment regime. What is effective can be structural, financial, cultural, administrative, conceptual, or all of the above. The chapter outlines the intangible hurdles, short-term orientation of programs that manifest over time, frequent changes in leadership, etc., and argues that key to effective campaigns is whether or not the recommendations are acted upon. The author concludes that, in the end, public diplomacy evaluation is neither magic bullet nor rabbit hole. It is a process that encourages institutional reflection, a tool that promotes learning, an exercise in soft discipline for staff, and a means to ensure accountability.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter explores the benefits and challenges of public diplomacy, notably identifying an effective assessment regime. What is effective can be structural, financial, cultural, administrative, conceptual, or all of the above. The chapter outlines the intangible hurdles, short-term orientation of programs that manifest over time, frequent changes in leadership, etc., and argues that key to effective campaigns is whether or not the recommendations are acted upon. The author concludes that, in the end, public diplomacy evaluation is neither magic bullet nor rabbit hole. It is a process that encourages institutional reflection, a tool that promotes learning, an exercise in soft discipline for staff, and a means to ensure accountability.

Key concepts: Diplomacy, Public diplomacy, Political science, Law, Politics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Public Diplomacy Evaluation — Research Paper | ScholarLens