2015OpenCommons at University of Connecticut (University of Connecticut)Open access

Steering a Safe Course in Admiralty Removal Jurisdiction after the 2011 Federal Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Clarification Act Note

Charles Frederick Modzelewski

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Federal jurisdiction over admiralty actions originates in the United States Constitution. Congress, in the admiralty jurisdiction statute, pursuant to what is commonly referred to as the saving to suitors clause, reserved to plaintiffs in admiralty actions the option of pursuing remedies in state court. However, in 2011, Congress enacted the Federal Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Clarification Act (JVCA), which changed key language in the federal removal statute. The JVCA amendment has been interpreted by certain courts in a manner that has allowed removal of general maritime actions from state court to federal court, which is contrary to admiralty jurisprudence. Not only is the removal of general maritime actions contrary to precedent, but the removal of general maritime claims to federal courts would eviscerate the saving to suitors clause, an action that would fundamentally alter admiralty jurisdiction. As the saving to suitors clause would be eviscerated, interpreting the 2011 Federal Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Clarification Act to allow the removal of general maritime actions from state court to federal court is erroneous.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Federal jurisdiction over admiralty actions originates in the United States Constitution. Congress, in the admiralty jurisdiction statute, pursuant to what is commonly referred to as the saving to suitors clause, reserved to plaintiffs in admiralty actions the option of pursuing remedies in state court. However, in 2011, Congress enacted the Federal Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Clarification Act (JVCA), which changed key language in the federal removal statute. The JVCA amendment has been interpreted by certain courts in a manner that has allowed removal of general maritime actions from state court to federal court, which is contrary to admiralty jurisprudence. Not only is the removal of general maritime actions contrary to precedent, but the removal of general maritime claims to federal courts would eviscerate the saving to suitors clause, an action that would fundamentally alter admiralty jurisdiction. As the saving to suitors clause would be eviscerated, interpreting the 2011 Federal Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Clarification Act to allow the removal of general maritime actions from state court to federal court is erroneous.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Federal jurisdiction over admiralty actions originates in the United States Constitution. Congress, in the admiralty jurisdiction statute, pursuant to what is commonly referred to as the saving to suitors clause, reserved to plaintiffs in admiralty actions the option of pursuing remedies in state court. However, in 2011, Congress enacted the Federal Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Clarification Act (JVCA), which changed key language in the federal removal statute. The JVCA amendment has been interpreted by certain courts in a manner that has allowed removal of general maritime actions from state court to federal court, which is contrary to admiralty jurisprudence. Not only is the removal of general maritime actions contrary to precedent, but the removal of general maritime claims to federal courts would eviscerate the saving to suitors clause, an action that would fundamentally alter admiralty jurisdiction. As the saving to suitors clause would be eviscerated, interpreting the 2011 Federal Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Clarification Act to allow the removal of general maritime actions from state court to federal court is erroneous.

Key concepts: Jurisdiction, Federal jurisdiction, Law, Political science, Course (navigation), Business, Engineering, Aerospace engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Steering a Safe Course in Admiralty Removal Jurisdiction after the 2011 Federal Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Clarification Act Note — Research Paper | ScholarLens