2017•Unpublished venueOpen access

Argumentation and Critical Thinking

Kathleen M. German

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter examines the structure of arguments, and offers ways for public speakers to critically evaluate the arguments of others. Argumentation is a process of advancing claims supported by good reasons and evidence. An argument is built out of three essential elements that must work together: the claim speakers advance, the relevant evidence that they provide in support of that claim, and the reasoning pattern that they use to connect the evidence with the claim. A claim of fact asserts that something is or is not the case. When speakers claim asserts that something is good or bad, desirable or undesirable, or justified or unjustified, there are advancing a claim of value: a claim about the intrinsic worth of the belief or action in question. A claim of policy recommends a course of action that they want the audience to approve. Reasoning is a process of connecting something that is known to an idea that they wish others to accept.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter examines the structure of arguments, and offers ways for public speakers to critically evaluate the arguments of others. Argumentation is a process of advancing claims supported by good reasons and evidence. An argument is built out of three essential elements that must work together: the claim speakers advance, the relevant evidence that they provide in support of that claim, and the reasoning pattern that they use to connect the evidence with the claim. A claim of fact asserts that something is or is not the case. When speakers claim asserts that something is good or bad, desirable or undesirable, or justified or unjustified, there are advancing a claim of value: a claim about the intrinsic worth of the belief or action in question. A claim of policy recommends a course of action that they want the audience to approve. Reasoning is a process of connecting something that is known to an idea that they wish others to accept.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter examines the structure of arguments, and offers ways for public speakers to critically evaluate the arguments of others. Argumentation is a process of advancing claims supported by good reasons and evidence. An argument is built out of three essential elements that must work together: the claim speakers advance, the relevant evidence that they provide in support of that claim, and the reasoning pattern that they use to connect the evidence with the claim. A claim of fact asserts that something is or is not the case. When speakers claim asserts that something is good or bad, desirable or undesirable, or justified or unjustified, there are advancing a claim of value: a claim about the intrinsic worth of the belief or action in question. A claim of policy recommends a course of action that they want the audience to approve. Reasoning is a process of connecting something that is known to an idea that they wish others to accept.

Key concepts: Argumentation theory, Epistemology, Critical thinking, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Argumentation and Critical Thinking — Research Paper | ScholarLens