2020Unpublished venueRequires access

The infinitesimal rule of three

K.D. STROYAN

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The infinitesimal formulation of strong derivative is simple, in fact, every bit as elementary as the pointwise derivative in the traditional non-infinitesimal approach. However, there are differences in the three basic foundations for Infinitesimal Analysis, even in formulating proofs of intuitive results of calculus. Numbers satisfying (Infsml) are called “infinitesimal” and zero is the only real infinitesimal by the archimedean property of the reals. H. J. Keisler’s Axioms provide an elegant solution to Leibniz’ 300 year old question of how one might rigorously develop calculus using infinitesimals. After A. Robinson’s invention of rigorous Infinitesimal Analysis, it soon became clear that his methods could be extended to a spectrum of problems in analysis, as shown already in 1966. The logical equivalence means that a standard function is derivable in the straightforward infinitesimal sense if and only if its difference quotients converge ‘locally uniformly’.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The infinitesimal formulation of strong derivative is simple, in fact, every bit as elementary as the pointwise derivative in the traditional non-infinitesimal approach. However, there are differences in the three basic foundations for Infinitesimal Analysis, even in formulating proofs of intuitive results of calculus. Numbers satisfying (Infsml) are called “infinitesimal” and zero is the only real infinitesimal by the archimedean property of the reals. H. J. Keisler’s Axioms provide an elegant solution to Leibniz’ 300 year old question of how one might rigorously develop calculus using infinitesimals. After A. Robinson’s invention of rigorous Infinitesimal Analysis, it soon became clear that his methods could be extended to a spectrum of problems in analysis, as shown already in 1966. The logical equivalence means that a standard function is derivable in the straightforward infinitesimal sense if and only if its difference quotients converge ‘locally uniformly’.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The infinitesimal formulation of strong derivative is simple, in fact, every bit as elementary as the pointwise derivative in the traditional non-infinitesimal approach. However, there are differences in the three basic foundations for Infinitesimal Analysis, even in formulating proofs of intuitive results of calculus. Numbers satisfying (Infsml) are called “infinitesimal” and zero is the only real infinitesimal by the archimedean property of the reals. H. J. Keisler’s Axioms provide an elegant solution to Leibniz’ 300 year old question of how one might rigorously develop calculus using infinitesimals. After A. Robinson’s invention of rigorous Infinitesimal Analysis, it soon became clear that his methods could be extended to a spectrum of problems in analysis, as shown already in 1966. The logical equivalence means that a standard function is derivable in the straightforward infinitesimal sense if and only if its difference quotients converge ‘locally uniformly’.

Key concepts: Infinitesimal, Infinitesimal transformation, Mathematics, Calculus (dental), Computer science, Mathematical analysis, Medicine, Dentistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The infinitesimal rule of three — Research Paper | ScholarLens