2018•TekstualiaRequires access

Lessons from the Dangers of Narrative Project: Toward a Story-Critical Narratology*

Maria Mäkelä

Open publisher page 24 citations

Abstract

The essay introduces new methods for applied and “story-critical” narratology that are based on the analysis of a crowdsourced corpus in the Dangers of Narrative research project. This analysis suggests that the prototype model of narrative developed by fi rst-wave cognitive narratologists resonates strongly with the popular understanding of what a narrative is and what it can do. Yet, more interestingly, the prototype model also reveals the pitfalls of narrative form in contemporary media. Reliance on individual, unverifi able experience is the most pertinent risk perceived by the informants participating in the crowdsourcing for “dubious” storytelling. The essay also sketches a new theory of viral storytelling spun around the “viral exemplum”, a concept created to describe the viral narrative prototype: a personal “true story” which is given undue representative and normative weight via online sharing.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The essay introduces new methods for applied and “story-critical” narratology that are based on the analysis of a crowdsourced corpus in the Dangers of Narrative research project. This analysis suggests that the prototype model of narrative developed by fi rst-wave cognitive narratologists resonates strongly with the popular understanding of what a narrative is and what it can do. Yet, more interestingly, the prototype model also reveals the pitfalls of narrative form in contemporary media. Reliance on individual, unverifi able experience is the most pertinent risk perceived by the informants participating in the crowdsourcing for “dubious” storytelling. The essay also sketches a new theory of viral storytelling spun around the “viral exemplum”, a concept created to describe the viral narrative prototype: a personal “true story” which is given undue representative and normative weight via online sharing.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 24 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The essay introduces new methods for applied and “story-critical” narratology that are based on the analysis of a crowdsourced corpus in the Dangers of Narrative research project. This analysis suggests that the prototype model of narrative developed by fi rst-wave cognitive narratologists resonates strongly with the popular understanding of what a narrative is and what it can do. Yet, more interestingly, the prototype model also reveals the pitfalls of narrative form in contemporary media. Reliance on individual, unverifi able experience is the most pertinent risk perceived by the informants participating in the crowdsourcing for “dubious” storytelling. The essay also sketches a new theory of viral storytelling spun around the “viral exemplum”, a concept created to describe the viral narrative prototype: a personal “true story” which is given undue representative and normative weight via online sharing.

Key concepts: Narratology, Narrative, Storytelling, Normative, Narrative inquiry, Narrative criticism, Sociology, Aesthetics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Lessons from the Dangers of Narrative Project: Toward a Story-Critical Narratology* — Research Paper | ScholarLens