Assessing Deterrence Optinos for Cyber Weapons
Elizabeth Wanic, Neil C. Rowe
Abstract
Elizabeth Wanic, Neil C. Rowe
Abstract
With the increasing frequency of cyberattacks due to nation-states, there has been growing discussion on how they can be deterred since the U.S. has been ineffective at deterring many Russian and Chinese cyber operations. This paper examines deterrence analysis and discusses its applicability in cyberspace. It describes differences between cyber weapons and conventional weapons and outlines the implications these differences can have on the effectiveness of cyber weapons as a deterrent. Motivations and expected outcomes of the cyber operations taken by the U.S. and its adversaries, including Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea, are highlighted. Possible deterrence enablers are discussed such as stockpiling cyber weapons, indicting individuals, imposing sanctions, improving defenses, demonstrating capabilities, using deceptive bait, counterattacking, and creating international agreements. The effectiveness of these actions in deterring adversaries from deploying their cyber capabilities is evaluated and recommendations are made.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
With the increasing frequency of cyberattacks due to nation-states, there has been growing discussion on how they can be deterred since the U.S. has been ineffective at deterring many Russian and Chinese cyber operations. This paper examines deterrence analysis and discusses its applicability in cyberspace. It describes differences between cyber weapons and conventional weapons and outlines the implications these differences can have on the effectiveness of cyber weapons as a deterrent. Motivations and expected outcomes of the cyber operations taken by the U.S. and its adversaries, including Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea, are highlighted. Possible deterrence enablers are discussed such as stockpiling cyber weapons, indicting individuals, imposing sanctions, improving defenses, demonstrating capabilities, using deceptive bait, counterattacking, and creating international agreements. The effectiveness of these actions in deterring adversaries from deploying their cyber capabilities is evaluated and recommendations are made.
Key concepts: Cyberspace, Deterrence theory, Sanctions, Computer security, Cyberwarfare, China, Nuclear weapon, Deterrence (psychology)