2012Unpublished venueRequires access

Motivations of Fraud Deterrence and the Transition to Investigation

Harry Cendrowski, James P. Martin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Fraud deterrence engagements play a central role in the assessment of internal controls. While many in management believe that such a role is fulfilled by both the internal audit department and third-party audits, fraud deterrence is not the primary goal of either function. Fraud deterrence engagements have a specific place in the organization, above and beyond the functions of internal and external audits. Deterrence and investigation are complimentary processes, and frequently intertwined. This chapter details not only the motivation behind fraud deterrence engagements, but also the pitfalls associated with them and methods to ensure success, should an investigation end with a courtroom trail.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Fraud deterrence engagements play a central role in the assessment of internal controls. While many in management believe that such a role is fulfilled by both the internal audit department and third-party audits, fraud deterrence is not the primary goal of either function. Fraud deterrence engagements have a specific place in the organization, above and beyond the functions of internal and external audits. Deterrence and investigation are complimentary processes, and frequently intertwined. This chapter details not only the motivation behind fraud deterrence engagements, but also the pitfalls associated with them and methods to ensure success, should an investigation end with a courtroom trail.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Fraud deterrence engagements play a central role in the assessment of internal controls. While many in management believe that such a role is fulfilled by both the internal audit department and third-party audits, fraud deterrence is not the primary goal of either function. Fraud deterrence engagements have a specific place in the organization, above and beyond the functions of internal and external audits. Deterrence and investigation are complimentary processes, and frequently intertwined. This chapter details not only the motivation behind fraud deterrence engagements, but also the pitfalls associated with them and methods to ensure success, should an investigation end with a courtroom trail.

Key concepts: Deterrence (psychology), Deterrence theory, Audit, Internal audit, Business, Function (biology), Criminology, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Motivations of Fraud Deterrence and the Transition to Investigation — Research Paper | ScholarLens