2016IP Indian Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial ResearchRequires access

Evaluation of condylar asymmetry in class II division 1 malocclusion patients a comparative radiographic study

Arshiya Ara Syeda, Uzma Roohi

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Background & Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate condylar asymmetry in a group of untreated Class II malocclusions and compare them with a control group of normal Class I malocclusion using Habets et al technique. Materials & Methods: The study group consisted of 100 patients with class II Div 1 malocclusion (50males and 50 females), and a control group of 100 subjects with normal class I occlusion (50males and 50 females). Condylar, ramal, and condylar plus ramal asymmetry values were computed for all of the subjects on orthopantomograms. Data were analyzed statistically by means of Z-test to compare between normal occlusion and class II div 1 malocclusion for each male and female group. Results & Interpretation: Significant difference was observed in condylar height, combined height and condylar asymmetrical ratio respectively when compared between normal classes I occlusion and class II div I malocclusion. Similarly significant differences was observed between condylar height, combined height and condylar asymmetrical ratio in males. However, all other asymmetrical ratios were insignificant. Similarly for females, condylar height, combined height and asymmetrical ratios were all insignificant. Conclusion: Our study shows CAI value was significantly higher in Class II/1 malocclusion males when compared with normal Class I malocclusion. This malocclusion could act as a predisposing factor for having asymmetric condyles if left untreated. Keywords: Mandibular asymmetry, Condylar asymmetry index, Ramal asymmetry index, Class II subdivision 1 malocclusion, Orthopantogram

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background & Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate condylar asymmetry in a group of untreated Class II malocclusions and compare them with a control group of normal Class I malocclusion using Habets et al technique. Materials & Methods: The study group consisted of 100 patients with class II Div 1 malocclusion (50males and 50 females), and a control group of 100 subjects with normal class I occlusion (50males and 50 females). Condylar, ramal, and condylar plus ramal asymmetry values were computed for all of the subjects on orthopantomograms. Data were analyzed statistically by means of Z-test to compare between normal occlusion and class II div 1 malocclusion for each male and female group. Results & Interpretation: Significant difference was observed in condylar height, combined height and condylar asymmetrical ratio respectively when compared between normal classes I occlusion and class II div I malocclusion. Similarly significant differences was observed between condylar height, combined height and condylar asymmetrical ratio in males. However, all other asymmetrical ratios were insignificant. Similarly for females, condylar height, combined height and asymmetrical ratios were all insignificant. Conclusion: Our study shows CAI value was significantly higher in Class II/1 malocclusion males when compared with normal Class I malocclusion. This malocclusion could act as a predisposing factor for having asymmetric condyles if left untreated. Keywords: Mandibular asymmetry, Condylar asymmetry index, Ramal asymmetry index, Class II subdivision 1 malocclusion, Orthopantogram

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background & Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate condylar asymmetry in a group of untreated Class II malocclusions and compare them with a control group of normal Class I malocclusion using Habets et al technique. Materials & Methods: The study group consisted of 100 patients with class II Div 1 malocclusion (50males and 50 females), and a control group of 100 subjects with normal class I occlusion (50males and 50 females). Condylar, ramal, and condylar plus ramal asymmetry values were computed for all of the subjects on orthopantomograms. Data were analyzed statistically by means of Z-test to compare between normal occlusion and class II div 1 malocclusion for each male and female group. Results & Interpretation: Significant difference was observed in condylar height, combined height and condylar asymmetrical ratio respectively when compared between normal classes I occlusion and class II div I malocclusion. Similarly significant differences was observed between condylar height, combined height and condylar asymmetrical ratio in males. However, all other asymmetrical ratios were insignificant. Similarly for females, condylar height, combined height and asymmetrical ratios were all insignificant. Conclusion: Our study shows CAI value was significantly higher in Class II/1 malocclusion males when compared with normal Class I malocclusion. This malocclusion could act as a predisposing factor for having asymmetric condyles if left untreated. Keywords: Mandibular asymmetry, Condylar asymmetry index, Ramal asymmetry index, Class II subdivision 1 malocclusion, Orthopantogram

Key concepts: Condyle, Malocclusion, Occlusion, Dentistry, Orthodontics, Medicine, Asymmetry, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of condylar asymmetry in class II division 1 malocclusion patients a comparative radiographic study — Research Paper | ScholarLens