[Comparison of temporomandibular joint changes in adolescent Class II devision 1 malocclusion patients with mandibular retrusion treated with Twin-block and Class II elastics].
Lixiang Mai, Yu Yao, Sheng Zhang, Dawei Wang, Zhiguang Zhang
Abstract
Lixiang Mai, Yu Yao, Sheng Zhang, Dawei Wang, Zhiguang Zhang
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the temporomandibular joint changes in adolescent Class II division 1 malocclusion patients with mandibular retrusion treated with Twin- block and Class II elastics. METHODS: Sixty Class II division 1 malocclusion patients with mandibular retrusion were divided into 3 groups (Twin- block group, Class II elastic group and control group, 20 patients in each group) randomly. Differences of condylar process morphology were compared using cone- beam CT (CBCT) before and after treatment. RESULTS: Condylar largest anteroposterior diameter and upper condylar height increased after treatment in both Twin-block group and Class II elastic group. The condylar largest anteroposterior diameter and upper condylar height were longer in both Twin- block group [(8.51 ± 1.48) and (7.39 ± 1.42) mm] and Class II elastic group [(8.44 ± 1.03) and (7.24 ± 0.89) mm] than those in the control group [(7.47 ± 1.27) and (6.47 ± 1.56) mm] (P<0.05). No significant difference was found in other measurements (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Condylar largest anteroposterior diameter and upper condylar height in Class II division 1 malocclusion patients increased after treatment using Twin- block and Class II elastics. There was no significant difference between two groups.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the temporomandibular joint changes in adolescent Class II division 1 malocclusion patients with mandibular retrusion treated with Twin- block and Class II elastics. METHODS: Sixty Class II division 1 malocclusion patients with mandibular retrusion were divided into 3 groups (Twin- block group, Class II elastic group and control group, 20 patients in each group) randomly. Differences of condylar process morphology were compared using cone- beam CT (CBCT) before and after treatment. RESULTS: Condylar largest anteroposterior diameter and upper condylar height increased after treatment in both Twin-block group and Class II elastic group. The condylar largest anteroposterior diameter and upper condylar height were longer in both Twin- block group [(8.51 ± 1.48) and (7.39 ± 1.42) mm] and Class II elastic group [(8.44 ± 1.03) and (7.24 ± 0.89) mm] than those in the control group [(7.47 ± 1.27) and (6.47 ± 1.56) mm] (P<0.05). No significant difference was found in other measurements (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Condylar largest anteroposterior diameter and upper condylar height in Class II division 1 malocclusion patients increased after treatment using Twin- block and Class II elastics. There was no significant difference between two groups.
Key concepts: Condyle, Malocclusion, Temporomandibular joint, Orthodontics, Dentistry, Medicine