2014PubMedRequires access

[Comparison of temporomandibular joint changes in adolescent Class II devision 1 malocclusion patients with mandibular retrusion treated with Twin-block and Class II elastics].

Lixiang Mai, Yu Yao, Sheng Zhang, Dawei Wang, Zhiguang Zhang

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the temporomandibular joint changes in adolescent Class II division 1 malocclusion patients with mandibular retrusion treated with Twin- block and Class II elastics. METHODS: Sixty Class II division 1 malocclusion patients with mandibular retrusion were divided into 3 groups (Twin- block group, Class II elastic group and control group, 20 patients in each group) randomly. Differences of condylar process morphology were compared using cone- beam CT (CBCT) before and after treatment. RESULTS: Condylar largest anteroposterior diameter and upper condylar height increased after treatment in both Twin-block group and Class II elastic group. The condylar largest anteroposterior diameter and upper condylar height were longer in both Twin- block group [(8.51 ± 1.48) and (7.39 ± 1.42) mm] and Class II elastic group [(8.44 ± 1.03) and (7.24 ± 0.89) mm] than those in the control group [(7.47 ± 1.27) and (6.47 ± 1.56) mm] (P<0.05). No significant difference was found in other measurements (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Condylar largest anteroposterior diameter and upper condylar height in Class II division 1 malocclusion patients increased after treatment using Twin- block and Class II elastics. There was no significant difference between two groups.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To compare the temporomandibular joint changes in adolescent Class II division 1 malocclusion patients with mandibular retrusion treated with Twin- block and Class II elastics. METHODS: Sixty Class II division 1 malocclusion patients with mandibular retrusion were divided into 3 groups (Twin- block group, Class II elastic group and control group, 20 patients in each group) randomly. Differences of condylar process morphology were compared using cone- beam CT (CBCT) before and after treatment. RESULTS: Condylar largest anteroposterior diameter and upper condylar height increased after treatment in both Twin-block group and Class II elastic group. The condylar largest anteroposterior diameter and upper condylar height were longer in both Twin- block group [(8.51 ± 1.48) and (7.39 ± 1.42) mm] and Class II elastic group [(8.44 ± 1.03) and (7.24 ± 0.89) mm] than those in the control group [(7.47 ± 1.27) and (6.47 ± 1.56) mm] (P<0.05). No significant difference was found in other measurements (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Condylar largest anteroposterior diameter and upper condylar height in Class II division 1 malocclusion patients increased after treatment using Twin- block and Class II elastics. There was no significant difference between two groups.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the temporomandibular joint changes in adolescent Class II division 1 malocclusion patients with mandibular retrusion treated with Twin- block and Class II elastics. METHODS: Sixty Class II division 1 malocclusion patients with mandibular retrusion were divided into 3 groups (Twin- block group, Class II elastic group and control group, 20 patients in each group) randomly. Differences of condylar process morphology were compared using cone- beam CT (CBCT) before and after treatment. RESULTS: Condylar largest anteroposterior diameter and upper condylar height increased after treatment in both Twin-block group and Class II elastic group. The condylar largest anteroposterior diameter and upper condylar height were longer in both Twin- block group [(8.51 ± 1.48) and (7.39 ± 1.42) mm] and Class II elastic group [(8.44 ± 1.03) and (7.24 ± 0.89) mm] than those in the control group [(7.47 ± 1.27) and (6.47 ± 1.56) mm] (P<0.05). No significant difference was found in other measurements (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Condylar largest anteroposterior diameter and upper condylar height in Class II division 1 malocclusion patients increased after treatment using Twin- block and Class II elastics. There was no significant difference between two groups.

Key concepts: Condyle, Malocclusion, Temporomandibular joint, Orthodontics, Dentistry, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Comparison of temporomandibular joint changes in adolescent Class II devision 1 malocclusion patients with mandibular retrusion treated with Twin-block and Class II elastics]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens