1998PubMedRequires access

[A comparative study of the results of 2 technical variants of protective trabeculectomy].

I Stefăniu, Mihail Zemba, C Niţulescu, N Niţă

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The paper presents a comparison between two glaucoma surgery techniques: classic trabeculectomy and trabeculectomy done with the punch. Both postoperative intraocular pressure and per and postoperative complications were similar. We consider that punch trabeculectomy is as valuable as classic trabeculectomy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The paper presents a comparison between two glaucoma surgery techniques: classic trabeculectomy and trabeculectomy done with the punch. Both postoperative intraocular pressure and per and postoperative complications were similar. We consider that punch trabeculectomy is as valuable as classic trabeculectomy.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The paper presents a comparison between two glaucoma surgery techniques: classic trabeculectomy and trabeculectomy done with the punch. Both postoperative intraocular pressure and per and postoperative complications were similar. We consider that punch trabeculectomy is as valuable as classic trabeculectomy.

Key concepts: Trabeculectomy, Intraocular pressure, Glaucoma, Medicine, Ophthalmology, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[A comparative study of the results of 2 technical variants of protective trabeculectomy]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens