2019•Unpublished venueRequires access

Decommissioning Cost Reduction by Effective Planning of Decommissioning Projects Using Facility Removal Date as a Reference Point

Aaron Tung, Claus Otto

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper reviews the existing planning process for decommissioning projects on the United Kingdom Continental Shelf (UKCS) and explores an alternative approach of planning decommissioning activities with reference to ‘Facility Removal Date’ rather than with reference to ‘Cessation of Production Date’. This alternative approach aims to enable a more effective planning of decommissioning activities in a high oil price and limited supply chain capacity environment to achieve cost reduction by: Improve Supply Chain Impact on Decommissioning Projects Provide Better Opportunities for Aggregation of Scope Promote Development of the Supply Chain This alternative planning approach offers a way for project engineers to plan decommissioning activities by using a new point of reference which offers a clearer distinction that separates well plugging and abandonment and facility’s removal operations in decommissioning projects. This alternative approach involves putting ‘Facility Removal Date’ as the main starting point of reference when planning decommissioning activities. This is an emergent insight from research investigating development of stakeholder-oriented critical paths, which was carried out using a mixed-method methodology incorporating Case Studies on Decommissioning Projects in the UKCS Semi-structured Interviews with Industry Representatives in the UKCS This alternative approach demonstrates the importance of the supply chain as a stakeholder in the UKCS decommissioning landscape. This paper will discuss the anticipated increase in demand and decommissioning activities in the UKCS and how it will correspond to an increasing supply chain influence and subsequent impacts on decommissioning projects. It will also show the effect of changing well plugging and abandonment strategies over the years on the change in significance of the ‘Cessation of Production Date’ and ‘Facility Removal Date’. This paper will discuss the emergent insights discovered when using ‘Facility Removal Date’ during the development of the critical paths. It will then further discuss how using ‘facility removal date’ in decommissioning planning can enable a more effective scheduling of activities, reduce uncertainty for the supply chain, and promote aggregation of scope, leading to cost reduction in decommissioning. The discussions will be further supported by qualitative data obtained from semi-structured interviews used for the development of the stakeholder-oriented critical paths.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract This paper reviews the existing planning process for decommissioning projects on the United Kingdom Continental Shelf (UKCS) and explores an alternative approach of planning decommissioning activities with reference to ‘Facility Removal Date’ rather than with reference to ‘Cessation of Production Date’. This alternative approach aims to enable a more effective planning of decommissioning activities in a high oil price and limited supply chain capacity environment to achieve cost reduction by: Improve Supply Chain Impact on Decommissioning Projects Provide Better Opportunities for Aggregation of Scope Promote Development of the Supply Chain This alternative planning approach offers a way for project engineers to plan decommissioning activities by using a new point of reference which offers a clearer distinction that separates well plugging and abandonment and facility’s removal operations in decommissioning projects. This alternative approach involves putting ‘Facility Removal Date’ as the main starting point of reference when planning decommissioning activities. This is an emergent insight from research investigating development of stakeholder-oriented critical paths, which was carried out using a mixed-method methodology incorporating Case Studies on Decommissioning Projects in the UKCS Semi-structured Interviews with Industry Representatives in the UKCS This alternative approach demonstrates the importance of the supply chain as a stakeholder in the UKCS decommissioning landscape. This paper will discuss the anticipated increase in demand and decommissioning activities in the UKCS and how it will correspond to an increasing supply chain influence and subsequent impacts on decommissioning projects. It will also show the effect of changing well plugging and abandonment strategies over the years on the change in significance of the ‘Cessation of Production Date’ and ‘Facility Removal Date’. This paper will discuss the emergent insights discovered when using ‘Facility Removal Date’ during the development of the critical paths. It will then further discuss how using ‘facility removal date’ in decommissioning planning can enable a more effective scheduling of activities, reduce uncertainty for the supply chain, and promote aggregation of scope, leading to cost reduction in decommissioning. The discussions will be further supported by qualitative data obtained from semi-structured interviews used for the development of the stakeholder-oriented critical paths.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract This paper reviews the existing planning process for decommissioning projects on the United Kingdom Continental Shelf (UKCS) and explores an alternative approach of planning decommissioning activities with reference to ‘Facility Removal Date’ rather than with reference to ‘Cessation of Production Date’. This alternative approach aims to enable a more effective planning of decommissioning activities in a high oil price and limited supply chain capacity environment to achieve cost reduction by: Improve Supply Chain Impact on Decommissioning Projects Provide Better Opportunities for Aggregation of Scope Promote Development of the Supply Chain This alternative planning approach offers a way for project engineers to plan decommissioning activities by using a new point of reference which offers a clearer distinction that separates well plugging and abandonment and facility’s removal operations in decommissioning projects. This alternative approach involves putting ‘Facility Removal Date’ as the main starting point of reference when planning decommissioning activities. This is an emergent insight from research investigating development of stakeholder-oriented critical paths, which was carried out using a mixed-method methodology incorporating Case Studies on Decommissioning Projects in the UKCS Semi-structured Interviews with Industry Representatives in the UKCS This alternative approach demonstrates the importance of the supply chain as a stakeholder in the UKCS decommissioning landscape. This paper will discuss the anticipated increase in demand and decommissioning activities in the UKCS and how it will correspond to an increasing supply chain influence and subsequent impacts on decommissioning projects. It will also show the effect of changing well plugging and abandonment strategies over the years on the change in significance of the ‘Cessation of Production Date’ and ‘Facility Removal Date’. This paper will discuss the emergent insights discovered when using ‘Facility Removal Date’ during the development of the critical paths. It will then further discuss how using ‘facility removal date’ in decommissioning planning can enable a more effective scheduling of activities, reduce uncertainty for the supply chain, and promote aggregation of scope, leading to cost reduction in decommissioning. The discussions will be further supported by qualitative data obtained from semi-structured interviews used for the development of the stakeholder-oriented critical paths.

Key concepts: Nuclear decommissioning, Abandonment (legal), Supply chain, Stakeholder, Environmental planning, Engineering, Business, Environmental science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Decommissioning Cost Reduction by Effective Planning of Decommissioning Projects Using Facility Removal Date as a Reference Point — Research Paper | ScholarLens