2018Europe PMC (PubMed Central)Requires access

Laser Refractive Surgery for Vision Correction: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness

Khai A. Tran, Andrea Ryce

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

Recent systematic review and meta-analysis found no significant differences in visual outcomes (efficacy and safety) or visual quality (post-operative higher-order aberrations and contrast sensitivity) among common used refractive surgical techniques, including Laser-Assisted in situ Keratomileusis (LASIK), Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK), Laser-Assisted Sub-Epithelial Keratomileusis (LASEK), and Epithelial Laser Keratomileusis (Epi-LASIK). The visual outcomes were often accomplished in short-term studies, while long-term outcomes are still unclear. The aim of this report is to review the long-term clinical effectiveness of laser refractive surgery for vision correction in adults, with particular emphasis on the length of time to avoid corrective eye wear, patient satisfaction and quality of life. Cost-effectiveness of laser refractive surgery is also taken into consideration in this review.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Recent systematic review and meta-analysis found no significant differences in visual outcomes (efficacy and safety) or visual quality (post-operative higher-order aberrations and contrast sensitivity) among common used refractive surgical techniques, including Laser-Assisted in situ Keratomileusis (LASIK), Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK), Laser-Assisted Sub-Epithelial Keratomileusis (LASEK), and Epithelial Laser Keratomileusis (Epi-LASIK). The visual outcomes were often accomplished in short-term studies, while long-term outcomes are still unclear. The aim of this report is to review the long-term clinical effectiveness of laser refractive surgery for vision correction in adults, with particular emphasis on the length of time to avoid corrective eye wear, patient satisfaction and quality of life. Cost-effectiveness of laser refractive surgery is also taken into consideration in this review.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Recent systematic review and meta-analysis found no significant differences in visual outcomes (efficacy and safety) or visual quality (post-operative higher-order aberrations and contrast sensitivity) among common used refractive surgical techniques, including Laser-Assisted in situ Keratomileusis (LASIK), Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK), Laser-Assisted Sub-Epithelial Keratomileusis (LASEK), and Epithelial Laser Keratomileusis (Epi-LASIK). The visual outcomes were often accomplished in short-term studies, while long-term outcomes are still unclear. The aim of this report is to review the long-term clinical effectiveness of laser refractive surgery for vision correction in adults, with particular emphasis on the length of time to avoid corrective eye wear, patient satisfaction and quality of life. Cost-effectiveness of laser refractive surgery is also taken into consideration in this review.

Key concepts: Keratomileusis, LASIK, Photorefractive keratectomy, Refractive surgery, Medicine, Laser, Optometry, Ophthalmology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Laser Refractive Surgery for Vision Correction: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness — Research Paper | ScholarLens