2007British Medical BulletinRequires access

Refractive surgery: what patients need to know

Vikentia J. Katsanevaki, Stephen J. Tuft

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Most procedures to treat refractive error are based on laser surgery, but other techniques are available. We review the relative advantages and the risk associated with the different surgical options. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: Laser refractive surgery is now a safe and effective alternative to glasses or contact lenses. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: Because refractive surgery is an area of rapidly developing technology, the relative benefits of the different surgical options remain uncertain. AREAS TO DEVELOP RESEARCH: Controlled trials are needed to provide better guidance as to the relative merits of the different surgical options. Better interventions are required to minimize the biological response after laser surface treatment to eliminate the need for mechanical cutting of a flap for laser in situ keratomileusis. An effective surgical treatment for presbyopia is awaited.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: Most procedures to treat refractive error are based on laser surgery, but other techniques are available. We review the relative advantages and the risk associated with the different surgical options. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: Laser refractive surgery is now a safe and effective alternative to glasses or contact lenses. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: Because refractive surgery is an area of rapidly developing technology, the relative benefits of the different surgical options remain uncertain. AREAS TO DEVELOP RESEARCH: Controlled trials are needed to provide better guidance as to the relative merits of the different surgical options. Better interventions are required to minimize the biological response after laser surface treatment to eliminate the need for mechanical cutting of a flap for laser in situ keratomileusis. An effective surgical treatment for presbyopia is awaited.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: Most procedures to treat refractive error are based on laser surgery, but other techniques are available. We review the relative advantages and the risk associated with the different surgical options. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: Laser refractive surgery is now a safe and effective alternative to glasses or contact lenses. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: Because refractive surgery is an area of rapidly developing technology, the relative benefits of the different surgical options remain uncertain. AREAS TO DEVELOP RESEARCH: Controlled trials are needed to provide better guidance as to the relative merits of the different surgical options. Better interventions are required to minimize the biological response after laser surface treatment to eliminate the need for mechanical cutting of a flap for laser in situ keratomileusis. An effective surgical treatment for presbyopia is awaited.

Key concepts: Keratomileusis, Refractive surgery, Presbyopia, Medicine, Laser surgery, Refractive error, Laser, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Refractive surgery: what patients need to know — Research Paper | ScholarLens