2017•PubMedRequires access

Is There Any Difference Between The Biomechanical Strengths Of The Current Fixation Techniques For Comminuted Distal Patellar Fractures? (Comparison Of Distal Patella Fracture Fixation Techniques).

Onur Kocadal, Murad Pepe, Zafer Güneş, Ertuğrul Akşahin, Semra Duran, Cem Nuri Aktekin

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

In this biomechanical study, the strength of five different fixation techniques -anterior tension band wiring with K-wires, separate vertical wiring, headless compression screws with anterior tension band wiring, cannulated screws with tension band wiring and memory shape patellar fixator- for distal patellar fractures were compared. Forty calf knees were used for the biomechanical testing. Each specimen was pre-loaded with 10 N at 1 N/s. The distraction forces were applied consistently with the velocity of 5 mm/s. The ultimate load (N) and displacement (mm) values were recorded. The headless compression screw with anterior tension band wiring (656.9±167.9 N) and the cannulated screws with anterior tension band wiring (642.6±166.0 N) obtained significantly higher ultimate loading values compared to the other fixation methods (p<0.05). Fixation via cannulated screws with anterior tension band wiring techniques are more stabile than the patellar shape memory fixator and anterior K wire fixation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this biomechanical study, the strength of five different fixation techniques -anterior tension band wiring with K-wires, separate vertical wiring, headless compression screws with anterior tension band wiring, cannulated screws with tension band wiring and memory shape patellar fixator- for distal patellar fractures were compared. Forty calf knees were used for the biomechanical testing. Each specimen was pre-loaded with 10 N at 1 N/s. The distraction forces were applied consistently with the velocity of 5 mm/s. The ultimate load (N) and displacement (mm) values were recorded. The headless compression screw with anterior tension band wiring (656.9±167.9 N) and the cannulated screws with anterior tension band wiring (642.6±166.0 N) obtained significantly higher ultimate loading values compared to the other fixation methods (p<0.05). Fixation via cannulated screws with anterior tension band wiring techniques are more stabile than the patellar shape memory fixator and anterior K wire fixation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this biomechanical study, the strength of five different fixation techniques -anterior tension band wiring with K-wires, separate vertical wiring, headless compression screws with anterior tension band wiring, cannulated screws with tension band wiring and memory shape patellar fixator- for distal patellar fractures were compared. Forty calf knees were used for the biomechanical testing. Each specimen was pre-loaded with 10 N at 1 N/s. The distraction forces were applied consistently with the velocity of 5 mm/s. The ultimate load (N) and displacement (mm) values were recorded. The headless compression screw with anterior tension band wiring (656.9±167.9 N) and the cannulated screws with anterior tension band wiring (642.6±166.0 N) obtained significantly higher ultimate loading values compared to the other fixation methods (p<0.05). Fixation via cannulated screws with anterior tension band wiring techniques are more stabile than the patellar shape memory fixator and anterior K wire fixation.

Key concepts: Tension band wiring, Patella fracture, Fixation (population genetics), Medicine, Orthodontics, Biomechanics, Tension (geology), Compression (physics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Is There Any Difference Between The Biomechanical Strengths Of The Current Fixation Techniques For Comminuted Distal Patellar Fractures? (Comparison Of Distal Patella Fracture Fixation Techniques). — Research Paper | ScholarLens