Evaluation of Three Frost Heave Models: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, NH, USA.
Karen S. Henry, Ming Zhu, Radosław L. Michałowski
Abstract
Karen S. Henry, Ming Zhu, Radosław L. Michałowski
Abstract
Simulating the water and ice content of the ground, with an emphasis on the capacity to bear traffic, is important for planning the use of existing roads. Of most interest is how weak the ground becomes during thaw and the length of time during which the ground is weakened. If a model accurately predicts frost heave and the locations of the ice lenses that form based on ground surface temperatures, it then is a good starting point for understanding the location of the moisture during thaw. For this reason, we evaluated and compared three frost heave models based on the results of laboratory soil freezing tests. Of the three frost heave models evaluated, the PC-Heave model and the Porosity Rate model accurately simulated the frost heave. FROST was less accurate than the other two models.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Simulating the water and ice content of the ground, with an emphasis on the capacity to bear traffic, is important for planning the use of existing roads. Of most interest is how weak the ground becomes during thaw and the length of time during which the ground is weakened. If a model accurately predicts frost heave and the locations of the ice lenses that form based on ground surface temperatures, it then is a good starting point for understanding the location of the moisture during thaw. For this reason, we evaluated and compared three frost heave models based on the results of laboratory soil freezing tests. Of the three frost heave models evaluated, the PC-Heave model and the Porosity Rate model accurately simulated the frost heave. FROST was less accurate than the other two models.
Key concepts: Frost heaving, Frost (temperature), Ground freezing, Geotechnical engineering, Engineering, Environmental science, Geology, Meteorology