2005Proceedings of the international conferences on the bearing capacity of roads, railways and airfieldsRequires access

Evaluation of Three Frost Heave Models: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, NH, USA.

Karen S. Henry, Ming Zhu, Radosław L. Michałowski

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Simulating the water and ice content of the ground, with an emphasis on the capacity to bear traffic, is important for planning the use of existing roads. Of most interest is how weak the ground becomes during thaw and the length of time during which the ground is weakened. If a model accurately predicts frost heave and the locations of the ice lenses that form based on ground surface temperatures, it then is a good starting point for understanding the location of the moisture during thaw. For this reason, we evaluated and compared three frost heave models based on the results of laboratory soil freezing tests. Of the three frost heave models evaluated, the PC-Heave model and the Porosity Rate model accurately simulated the frost heave. FROST was less accurate than the other two models.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Simulating the water and ice content of the ground, with an emphasis on the capacity to bear traffic, is important for planning the use of existing roads. Of most interest is how weak the ground becomes during thaw and the length of time during which the ground is weakened. If a model accurately predicts frost heave and the locations of the ice lenses that form based on ground surface temperatures, it then is a good starting point for understanding the location of the moisture during thaw. For this reason, we evaluated and compared three frost heave models based on the results of laboratory soil freezing tests. Of the three frost heave models evaluated, the PC-Heave model and the Porosity Rate model accurately simulated the frost heave. FROST was less accurate than the other two models.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Simulating the water and ice content of the ground, with an emphasis on the capacity to bear traffic, is important for planning the use of existing roads. Of most interest is how weak the ground becomes during thaw and the length of time during which the ground is weakened. If a model accurately predicts frost heave and the locations of the ice lenses that form based on ground surface temperatures, it then is a good starting point for understanding the location of the moisture during thaw. For this reason, we evaluated and compared three frost heave models based on the results of laboratory soil freezing tests. Of the three frost heave models evaluated, the PC-Heave model and the Porosity Rate model accurately simulated the frost heave. FROST was less accurate than the other two models.

Key concepts: Frost heaving, Frost (temperature), Ground freezing, Geotechnical engineering, Engineering, Environmental science, Geology, Meteorology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of Three Frost Heave Models: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, NH, USA. — Research Paper | ScholarLens