2019Journal of Food Process EngineeringRequires access

Effect of Refractance Window on dehydration of osmotically pretreated apple slices: Color and texture evaluation

Yossebann Hernández, Cristián Ramírez, Jorge Moreno, Helena Núñez, Oscar Vega‐Castro, Sergio Almonacid, Marlene Pinto, Lida Fuentes, Ricardo Simpson

Open publisher page 22 citations

Abstract

Abstract The objective of this research was to explore the advantages of apple slices dehydration (cv. Granny Smith) using a Refractance Window (RW) with and without osmotic dehydration as pretreatment and compared with conventional hot‐air drying considering the quality attributes such as color and texture. For pretreatment, the apple slices were osmotically dehydrated and coupled to a moderate electric field (9.3 V/cm) using a sucrose solution (45°Brix) at 40°C until an Aw = 0.95 was achieved. Then, apple slices (with and without pretreatment) were dehydrated using RW at 55, 75, and 95°C and compared with conventional hot‐air drying at 55°C as a control. The results showed that with dehydration using RW, both with and without pretreatment at 95°C, it was possible to achieve a similar quality of apple slices when compared with conventional hot‐air drying at 55°C, but with a significant reduction in processing time. Additionally, the dehydration process using RW presented anomalous diffusion behavior on apple slices with an α > 1. Practical applications Refractance Window (RW) is a technology used for dehydration of fruit and vegetables slices and pulp based on the refractance properties of wet materials. RW has reported promising results in processing time reduction as compared with conventional dehydration methods. In addition, the quality of the end products by RW is higher as compared with conventional drying methods. In this research, we have showed that the final product (dehydrated apple slices) using RW attained quality values (color and texture) similar to those obtained with osmotic dehydration (OD) coupled with moderate electric field (MEF)/hot‐air drying. However, the time spent by RW (50 min) was much lower than OD coupled with MEF/hot‐air drying (240 min). Then, the main advantage of RW is the capacity to dehydrate fruit and vegetables materials using temperatures around 100°C, which allow both, reduce processing time and also attain high‐quality retention.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract The objective of this research was to explore the advantages of apple slices dehydration (cv. Granny Smith) using a Refractance Window (RW) with and without osmotic dehydration as pretreatment and compared with conventional hot‐air drying considering the quality attributes such as color and texture. For pretreatment, the apple slices were osmotically dehydrated and coupled to a moderate electric field (9.3 V/cm) using a sucrose solution (45°Brix) at 40°C until an Aw = 0.95 was achieved. Then, apple slices (with and without pretreatment) were dehydrated using RW at 55, 75, and 95°C and compared with conventional hot‐air drying at 55°C as a control. The results showed that with dehydration using RW, both with and without pretreatment at 95°C, it was possible to achieve a similar quality of apple slices when compared with conventional hot‐air drying at 55°C, but with a significant reduction in processing time. Additionally, the dehydration process using RW presented anomalous diffusion behavior on apple slices with an α > 1. Practical applications Refractance Window (RW) is a technology used for dehydration of fruit and vegetables slices and pulp based on the refractance properties of wet materials. RW has reported promising results in processing time reduction as compared with conventional dehydration methods. In addition, the quality of the end products by RW is higher as compared with conventional drying methods. In this research, we have showed that the final product (dehydrated apple slices) using RW attained quality values (color and texture) similar to those obtained with osmotic dehydration (OD) coupled with moderate electric field (MEF)/hot‐air drying. However, the time spent by RW (50 min) was much lower than OD coupled with MEF/hot‐air drying (240 min). Then, the main advantage of RW is the capacity to dehydrate fruit and vegetables materials using temperatures around 100°C, which allow both, reduce processing time and also attain high‐quality retention.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 22 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract The objective of this research was to explore the advantages of apple slices dehydration (cv. Granny Smith) using a Refractance Window (RW) with and without osmotic dehydration as pretreatment and compared with conventional hot‐air drying considering the quality attributes such as color and texture. For pretreatment, the apple slices were osmotically dehydrated and coupled to a moderate electric field (9.3 V/cm) using a sucrose solution (45°Brix) at 40°C until an Aw = 0.95 was achieved. Then, apple slices (with and without pretreatment) were dehydrated using RW at 55, 75, and 95°C and compared with conventional hot‐air drying at 55°C as a control. The results showed that with dehydration using RW, both with and without pretreatment at 95°C, it was possible to achieve a similar quality of apple slices when compared with conventional hot‐air drying at 55°C, but with a significant reduction in processing time. Additionally, the dehydration process using RW presented anomalous diffusion behavior on apple slices with an α > 1. Practical applications Refractance Window (RW) is a technology used for dehydration of fruit and vegetables slices and pulp based on the refractance properties of wet materials. RW has reported promising results in processing time reduction as compared with conventional dehydration methods. In addition, the quality of the end products by RW is higher as compared with conventional drying methods. In this research, we have showed that the final product (dehydrated apple slices) using RW attained quality values (color and texture) similar to those obtained with osmotic dehydration (OD) coupled with moderate electric field (MEF)/hot‐air drying. However, the time spent by RW (50 min) was much lower than OD coupled with MEF/hot‐air drying (240 min). Then, the main advantage of RW is the capacity to dehydrate fruit and vegetables materials using temperatures around 100°C, which allow both, reduce processing time and also attain high‐quality retention.

Key concepts: Osmotic dehydration, Dehydration, Chemistry, Sucrose, Texture (cosmology), Food science, Pulp (tooth), Chromatography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of Refractance Window on dehydration of osmotically pretreated apple slices: Color and texture evaluation — Research Paper | ScholarLens