2019Korean Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck SurgeryOpen access

Paradoxical Response to Cold Dry Air Provocation according to the Season in Allergic Rhinitis Patients

Ki-Ik Park, Tae Young Jang, Sung‐Hoon Kim, Ki Nam Kim, Young Hyo Kim

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Background and ObjectivesWe investigated the seasonal variation of nonspecific hyperreactivity by performing the cold dry air (CDA) provocation test in both summer and winter in patients with rhinitis. Subjects and MethodWe performed the CDA provocation test in 57 patients with allergic rhinitis (AR) or non-allergic rhinitis (NAR).Depending on the season and the type of rhinitis, we divided patients into four groups (Summer AR group, n=17; Winter AR group, n=15; Summer NAR group, n=18 and Winter NAR group, n=7) and compared the changes in nasal symptoms, total nasal volume (TNV), and minimal cross-sectional area (MCA) measured by acoustic rhinometry after CDA provocation in each group. ResultsWhen the CDA provocation was performed for AR patients in summer, nasal symptoms improved slightly, which was significantly different from those shown in winter (Summer AR vs. Winter AR, p=0.012).In addition, there was a significant difference in symptom change between AR and NAR patients in the summer (Summer AR vs. Summer NAR, p=0.033).There was no significant difference in TNV or MCA changes after CDA provocation depending on the type of rhinitis and season (p>0.05).Conclusion When performing CDA provocation in AR patients in summer, the examiner should pay attention to the possible paradoxical response.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background and ObjectivesWe investigated the seasonal variation of nonspecific hyperreactivity by performing the cold dry air (CDA) provocation test in both summer and winter in patients with rhinitis. Subjects and MethodWe performed the CDA provocation test in 57 patients with allergic rhinitis (AR) or non-allergic rhinitis (NAR).Depending on the season and the type of rhinitis, we divided patients into four groups (Summer AR group, n=17; Winter AR group, n=15; Summer NAR group, n=18 and Winter NAR group, n=7) and compared the changes in nasal symptoms, total nasal volume (TNV), and minimal cross-sectional area (MCA) measured by acoustic rhinometry after CDA provocation in each group. ResultsWhen the CDA provocation was performed for AR patients in summer, nasal symptoms improved slightly, which was significantly different from those shown in winter (Summer AR vs. Winter AR, p=0.012).In addition, there was a significant difference in symptom change between AR and NAR patients in the summer (Summer AR vs. Summer NAR, p=0.033).There was no significant difference in TNV or MCA changes after CDA provocation depending on the type of rhinitis and season (p>0.05).Conclusion When performing CDA provocation in AR patients in summer, the examiner should pay attention to the possible paradoxical response.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background and ObjectivesWe investigated the seasonal variation of nonspecific hyperreactivity by performing the cold dry air (CDA) provocation test in both summer and winter in patients with rhinitis. Subjects and MethodWe performed the CDA provocation test in 57 patients with allergic rhinitis (AR) or non-allergic rhinitis (NAR).Depending on the season and the type of rhinitis, we divided patients into four groups (Summer AR group, n=17; Winter AR group, n=15; Summer NAR group, n=18 and Winter NAR group, n=7) and compared the changes in nasal symptoms, total nasal volume (TNV), and minimal cross-sectional area (MCA) measured by acoustic rhinometry after CDA provocation in each group. ResultsWhen the CDA provocation was performed for AR patients in summer, nasal symptoms improved slightly, which was significantly different from those shown in winter (Summer AR vs. Winter AR, p=0.012).In addition, there was a significant difference in symptom change between AR and NAR patients in the summer (Summer AR vs. Summer NAR, p=0.033).There was no significant difference in TNV or MCA changes after CDA provocation depending on the type of rhinitis and season (p>0.05).Conclusion When performing CDA provocation in AR patients in summer, the examiner should pay attention to the possible paradoxical response.

Key concepts: Provocation test, Acoustic rhinometry, Nasal provocation test, Medicine, Nose, Anesthesia, Internal medicine, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Paradoxical Response to Cold Dry Air Provocation according to the Season in Allergic Rhinitis Patients — Research Paper | ScholarLens